Throughout my 15 years writing on End-times and geopolitically-relevant events I’ve been a Daily Telegraph subscriber and often cited articles by its capable journalists.

Over the past year I’ve noticed its US-based editors provide a patchy coverage of American politics and miss many things my roving eye notices through not only a few news channels but also several independent ‘digital warriors’ work. Therefore, an increase in subscription rates for broadsheet version was a good time to change to digital subscription only.

Moreover, its editorial teams’ incomplete grasp of the character and mission of Donald Trump fails to enable readers to gain a full appreciation of the facts, as witnessed by a number of readers’ jaundiced views on its Letters page.

The final straw came the morning after the Biden-Trump debate debacle at the close of its editorial staff’s ‘Telegraph View’ – Joe Biden Cannot Run Again, viz:

‘..The president is known to put great store by the values of service and duty. Even though his presidency has not obviously been successful, failing in its central aim of bringing the United States back together again after a period of hyper-partisanship, Mr Biden is not a dishonourable man. (!!! – RB) However, he should recognise that it is time for someone else to take the battle to Mr Trump. Nobody is well-served by allowing the current situation to continue.’

What planet are the Daily Telegraph’s editors living on, or dropped down from??

In the USA Biden has a reputation for telling lies AND IS THUS DISHONOURABLE, as attested by American journalists – and lawyers such as the renowned professor whom media often consult upon the US Constitution, Jonathan Turley.

LIES OVER SCOTUS RULING

On Tuesday Jonathan demolishes the Daily Telegraph’s claim that “Biden is not a dishonourable man” in this this MUST-READ article:

Note Professor Turley’s opening remarks (emphases mine):

As I have previously written, I am not someone who has favored expansive presidential powers. As a Madisonian scholar, I favor Congress in most disputes with presidents. However, I saw good-faith arguments on both sides of this case and the Court adopted a middle-road on immunity — rejecting the extreme positions of both the Trump team and the lower court.

Another must-read is by Barabara Boyd, which opens:

‘The Trump immunity decision was delivered on Monday. It immediately provoked primal screams throughout the Democratic Party and their captured media, in seeming chorus with the three Supreme Court justices who dissented. Yet, it amounted, in almost all respects, to Chief Justice Roberts simply reading the U.S. Constitution aloud. He didn’t need the teleprompter Joe Biden needed for his own four- and one-half minute nationally televised fit about it, Monday night. As usual, Biden’s teleprompter issued a lie a second, leading with the claim that Trump supporters had tried to hang the Vice-President on January 6, 2021. The U.S. Supreme Court was called “lawless.”

By sticking with our founding document, Chief Justice John Roberts, and the majority of 5 other justices saved the U.S. presidency and with it, the ability to right this nation, which had been flooded with illegal and republic destroying lawfare ever since Donald Trump first walked down the escalator in 2015. The Court ruled that presidents enjoy absolute immunity from prosecution when exercising their core responsibilities as specified in Article II of the Constitution, a presumption of immunity for their official acts, which can be rebutted, and no immunity for purely private actions.

Otherwise, every president in the future would endure what Donald Trump has endured, multiple criminal prosecutions initiated through his or her successor, to eliminate them from the political sphere. The nation would quickly collapse into the banana republic envisioned by the Barack Obama-led Democratic Party for whom the lawless exercise of political power has become the norm. Justice Thomas used his concurring opinion to point out that there is no constitutional basis for Special Prosecutor Jack Smith’s appointment, an argument which will increasingly be emphasized in both of Smith’s cases against Donald Trump…’

LIES IN DEBATE DEBACLE

The Federalist’s Shawn Fleetwood provides details of 20 ‘whoppers’ after writing as below and reminding readers of the events (descriptive listed only):

‘President Joe Biden isn’t known for telling the truth [‘379 and counting’]. So, it came as no surprise when the Delaware Democrat got up on stage to tell some pretty tall tales during Thursday’s debate with former President Donald Trump.

From the crisis he created at the U.S.-Mexico border to manufactured hoaxes about his opponent, there was almost no subject Biden didn’t lie about. Here are the 20 biggest whoppers he told during Thursday night’s matchup with the Orange Man.:

1. Border control endorsement
2. Trump bleach lie
3. Illegal border crossings
4. Military deaths
5. Inflation
6. Late-term abortion
7. Cages at the border
8. No new taxes
9. Hitler
10. Repeats debunked ‘suckers’ and ‘losers’ hoax
11. Trump’s Iran rally
12. Trump’s NATO remarks
13. Climate alarmism
14. Efforts to stop J6 riot
15. Roe v Wade
16. Beau’s death
17. ‘Very fine people’ lie
18. Unemployment under Trump
19. Trillionaires
20. NATO

Therefore, our British newspaper got it seriously wrong about Joe Biden not being dishonourable!