Category Archives: Law

Fulfilled prophecy #10:9 cont’d part 2 – exposure of rotten politics…and law!

Posted on by
5

‘Entangled in politics, the court has wrongly seized supreme power‘, thus runs Juliet Samuel’s excellent Saturday Comment on 28th September. Here’s a few snippets, as usual all emphases are mine:

‘The first clue as to the unsoundness of its judgment is that, just five years ago, it reached exactly the opposite conclusion on a crucial principle. The Crown’s power to prorogue has always been treated “a proceeding in Parliament” – a category of power explicitly protected from judicial interference by the 1689 Bill of Rights. In 2014, the Supreme Court itself ruled that the Crown’s actions in Parliament were sacrosanct and “cannot be questioned”. Continue reading →

Fulfilled prophecy #10:9 cont’d part 1 – exposure of rotten politics…and law!

Posted on by
Reply

Further to my two blogs of last Wednesday 26th September based upon my prophecy of 2016 on the Lord starting to expose rotten politics, and the spiritual battle for Brexit that’s so clearly evident behind the ‘Supreme’ Court’s ruling on the prorogation of Parliament, and the Court committing a travesty, if not miscarriage, of justice arising from its applying new law in retrospect; I’m most encouraged to read legal confirmation of this within His Honour Charles Wide QC’s letter to The Telegraph’s editor, as published on 1st October (emphases mine): Continue reading →

The Prime Minister doesn’t have to ask for an extension under the Benn Act. Here’s why and the irony is delicious

Posted on by
6

Here, David brings a concise analysis, seemingly following the principles summarised in the Brexit Legal Guide’s EU Law & The ECJ, published by Lawyers For Britain.  This is  helpful after my deep reservations on the ‘Supreme’ Court’s travesty of justice in judging against the PM’s advice to Her Majesty for the proroguing of Parliament.  However, one regular reader makes a sound criticism of David’s claims!

Wax Lyricals Blogspot

We have all heard that the Benn Act will ensure that No Deal is taken off the table and that unless Parliament agrees to a deal that under this Act, the Prime Minister by law must ask for an extension to Article 50. Yet whenever the Prime Minister or members of the Government are asked if the Prime Minister will comply with this requirement and ask for an extension? They reply with a wry smile that the Prime Minister will comply with the law.

So what’s going on?

How can he not ask the EU for an extension if that’s what the law of the land under the Benn Act says must happen?

To be honest it’s quite simple. Article 50 says that we will leave the EU at the end of negotiation period either with a negotiated withdrawal agreement or without.
The Benn act however, seeks to remove No…

View original post 706 more words

‘Supreme’ Court committed a travesty of justice? (Fulfilled Prophecy #10.9)

Posted on by
16

Dear reader, it’s none of my business but may I ask, “When did you last sit down to eat a meal at a table?”

You reply, “X hours (or Y days) ago. Why?”

I respond, “Well my friend, you acted illegally because I’ve introduced – only just now! – a new law stating meals are to be eaten whilst standing in the corner of a room. If you’re not alone, then each person must be in another corner of the room while each is eating; if there’s more than four of you then use another room too. For breaking this law you can face jail.”

In other words, in not having eaten your last meal by standing in the corner of a room you are breaking the law retrospectively – even though this new law did not exist when you had that meal…!!!

“An injustice!” you shout. Nevertheless, because I have the authority to invent new laws at whim then, by your own above confession, you are guilty of breaking it!

This ridiculous scenario is similar to the ‘Supreme’ Court’s judgement against the Prime Minister’s prorogation of Parliament. Retired Supreme Justice Lord Sumption, has said the court had invented a new rule in the relationship between the Judiciary and the Government, as reported in Supreme Court justices could be appointed by MPs…:

“What the Supreme Court has done is to invent a brand new rule that is undoubtedly controversial, a brand new constitutional rule, the effect of which is to reinstate Parliament at the heart of the decision-making process.”

Little wonder that Boris Johnson insisted in yesterday’s resumed Parliament that this Court’s decision was “wrong”.

What’s Prophetical? Continue reading →

Spiritual nature of Brexit vs. EU battle again displayed – twice in so-called ‘supreme court’!

Posted on by
16

Our break from blogging over the week of my birthday and our wedding anniversary is interrupted to cover as quickly as possible today’s news of the EU court’s ruling:

Last February we noticed a clear, public display of hostility of a spiritual nature when Donald Tusk cursed those who promoted Brexit – and, by association, all who voted to leave the EU – saying a  “special place is reserved for them in hell”, or sentiment to that effect. Thus, the EU leader’s heart was displayed for the whole world to see.

Then last Wednesday at the opening of the supposedly supreme court’s hearing on the prorogation of Parliament, our Prime Minister was savagely slandered in being likened to satan!  The QC representing the Remainer peers and MPs, and who’d been hired to serve an injunction upon The Queen in Balmoral, claimed in this court “What we have with prorogation is the mother of parliaments closed down by the father of lies”.  (That’s how Jesus referred to satan as being the source of religious leaders’ opposition – John 8:44)

A court president of integrity and worth his/her salt would have reprimanded an unproven, slanderous accusation such as that!

Today, that court’s president passed judgement against Prime Minister Boris Johnson whilst wearing a large brooch of a spider – with deliberate symbolic intent! (A spiritual symbol of the EU as seen in many visions. Thank you Hilary for giving me this news.) Brenda Hale’s deep anti-Referendum and pro-EU bias (like some of those justices, Leave EU refers) was covered in depth in the latter half of this post of 24 November 2016.

The Mirror too has drawn attention to this issue in ‘Secret message’ Supreme Court Judge gave Boris Johnson with spider brooch at ruling.

Having personally encountered the demonic spirit that apparently has rights of access in this judgement, I earnestly pray this woman have the same face-to-face encounter I did with the hideous, enormous spider-like Devourer (manifested first by masquerading as ecstatic light) and, like me, be filled with the Spirit of Fear of God.

Lord, may she be truly contrite and repent of not serving you, for she may be prepared for arraignment with her fellow justices in Your Heavenly Courts – the Ultimate Court.

Next, we’ll consider what Veronika West believes she heard from the Lord on this. Click to read >>

Essential reading: EU’s effects upon the British monarchy and military

Posted on by
1

These articles found Wednesday, relate to serious legal issues not many people are aware of because they’re outside the mainstream media circus and Brussels’ Brainwashing Cult. Click links to read..

Lord James: Remaining in the EU will Constitute Perjury by the Queen

‘Hero of Brexit’ Lord James of Blackheath Threatened over EU Defence Union

PS: for info – video dated 16 Sept, which I’ve yet to watch…

Your liberty and freedom come from Magna Carta not the EU

Posted on by
1

A superb addition to this blog’s collection of posts on Magna Carta and on EU law in David Chapman’s paper on the EU and An Alternative.

Wax Lyricals Blogspot

In the UK an individual has rights laid down since Magna Carta.
This is particularly important when a crime is committed or suspected of being committed. As under the rights laid down from Magna Carta onwards, someone in the UK is deemed innocent until proven guilty. If you are accused of a crime, the onus is on the State to prove your guilt.
The writ of Habeus Corpus prevents the State from imprisoning you without evidence of a crime.
Under the European legal system, they never had a Magna Carta of their own and as such they work under a different assumption than we do, in that you are guilty unless you can prove your innocence.
Thus, the State has the legal authority to imprison you whilst they find the evidence and formulate the case to convict you. The onus is on you to prove your innocence as there is…

View original post 508 more words

Leisa Ebere: Paradigm shift for the UK – warning prophecy to leaders

Posted on by
3

Leisa writes on Saturday, “The Lord gave me this strong prophetic word yesterday. A paradigm shift is about to descend upon this nation and we need to be declaring God’s goodness and sovereignty across the UK. Here is the Word.:

THE LEADERS PROPHECY

given to Leisa Ebere on 2nd August 2019

The Lord says that, “The pride of the leaders of this nation has caused blockage to blessing ordained by My Sovereign Hand. For surely, as in Nebuchadnezzar’s time, there is witchcraft within the city gates, which has caused a stubbornness of heart amongst the people,” says the Lord. “And rash decisions even now are being made by leaders, which are not aligned with My Kingdom’s advancement. The darkness of mind that came in the form of boanthropy upon that Babylonian king was allowed through open doors because of pride, witchcraft and tolerance of evil; and so shall a similar fate happen to those leaders that oppose My Divine Purposes in this hour across the nation of the United Kingdom. My People, rise with an expectancy of a New Day and let your tongues be active with declarations of righteousness and breakthrough for My Will to be performed across this land. Cast aside all doubt and keep your eyes fixed upon Me. For surely, I am separating and I am choosing men and women of purpose and destiny. Do not listen to doomsayers; but declare My goodness and walk into destiny as all decisions are made according to the leading and movement of My Spirit,” says the Lord of Hosts.

Bless you,

Leisa Ebere
Torchlighters International Ministry

As with all prophetic words and visions, the above is offered for weighing and testing with the Lord and holy writ.

In Defence of Freedom of Speech — Gavin Ashenden

Quote

Posted on by
4

TIMES are changing. Two of my great heroes have recently been banned from speaking on university campuses. Twenty years ago they were firebrand radicals, alarming the establishment with their fervour and campaigning. No one silenced them then. Now they have been silenced. Not by the establishment, but by the new cultural bullies.They are Germaine Greer…

click to continue reading > In defence of Freedom of Speech — Gavin Ashenden

It’s now vital that all right-thinking people take a stand against this deeply insidious and increasing fascism. Gavin draws to this important conclusion:

“And that is the origin of the idea of the hate crime. The cultural Marxists claim the right of the state to look inside your head, deem you to be bigoted and hate-filled, and set out to punish and silence you. They use tools ranging from the Twitter mob to the law. But just like Marxism Part 1, Part 2 won’t let up until the critics have been silenced and the state guards thoughts, as well as speech, of the citizens.

“How can this be resisted? With great difficulty. Words have changed their meaning. People have already been silenced. The young are being nurtured in the practice of censorship and control. The snowflake generation have mixed bad therapy with muddled philosophy and have swallowed it whole.’

“The struggle is between those who believe in free speech and those who add a ‘but’.”

2017: CoE sex-Synod sided with satan > 2019: CoE papers used in court against Christian doctor

Posted on by
1

My conclusion of two years ago today has, regrettably, proven true and developed into a wider issue out of what was euphemistically termed ‘CoE General Sex ‘Sin-nod’ 2017′. In opening my blog Synod sides with satan – risk of Anglican schism/shaking, I note that the legislative assembly of our national church ruled against practising the holy ordinance of normal marriage by saying, in effect, as in this extract from the blog:

‘General Synod: “NO, not as it means keeping God’s word on sex and marriage! How dare we insult people with what You say and expect.” [July 2017 AD]

‘Thus begins the Great Apostasy foretold by the apostle to the Gentiles?

…The Day of the Lord will not come unless the falling away comes first and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped…(2Thess 2:3-4)

‘The great falling away from faith in Christ Jesus has been gaining momentum for years (ie. mainly by individuals). However, decisions and official declarations by the Church of England’s recent General Synod, the tricameral deliberative and legislative gathering of bishops, clergy and laity, means we could now regard the Great Apostasy as being ‘officially’ under way.’

Therefore, along with a great many Christians I’m deeply concerned to learn the CoE’s subsequent official instructions and guidance documents have been quoted in court as evidence against a Christian!  As a nation we’ve thus fallen into utter, craven stupidity and are reaping the consequences of defying the Word of the Almighty.

Dr David Mackereth lost his job with the Department for Work and Pensions after he refused to identify clients by their chosen gender instead of their biological sex – and that was not in an actual case but only when discussing a hypothetical case of a 6-foot bearded man wanting to be called a woman!

Dr Mackereth said that using ‘transgender pronouns’ went against his conscience as a doctor and Bible-believing Christian. As explained earlier: “I believe gender is defined by biology and genetics. And that as a Christian the Bible teaches us that God made humans male or female.” (Telegraph 2018)

It is very disturbing to see a doctor with 26 years of experience in A&E medicine being forced to choose between telling the truth and his profession. In dismissing him, the DWP has violated the three freedoms of conscience, speech and religion in one go. We rely on doctors telling the truth. Imagine if they were forced to accept a patient’s chosen diagnosis!

In response, the DWP declared that failing to accommodate clients’ preferences to use ‘transgender pronouns’ would amount to “harassment” under the Equality Act 2010 and dismissed Dr Mackereth as Health and Disability Assessor.  Supported by the Christian Legal Centre, he challenged the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions but lost his case because the DWP relied upon Church of England documents to prove their case, even though the doctor is not an Anglican but a Bible-believing Christian! (Two terms  obviously not synonymous!)

In CofE Teaching Used As Evidence Against Christian In Court Andrea Williams, the Christian Legal Centre’s CEO, says,

“What really upset me though, as a member of the Church of England’s General Synod, was that the people who sacked Dr Mackereth for his Christian beliefs relied on the Church of England’s position to justify their actions. I have spent a lot of time trying to tell Christians, of all denominations, that our public witness to the Truth – all aspects of it – is vital.  When we are on TV, radio, or even in court we are often told that our brand of Christianity is not what lots of other Christians think. But, this week, for the first time, what the Church of England says was used as evidence against a Christian in court. For me it was another stark reminder of the damage caused by the Church of England’s abandonment of truth.

“The evidence deployed against Dr Mackereth included reference to the House of Bishops’ Guidance for welcoming transgender people, and the Pastoral Guidance for use in conjunction with the Affirmation of Baptismal Faith in the context of gender transition. I criticised these moves towards acceptance of transgenderism at the time, and Carys Moseley explained why the transgender issue is a first-order gospel issue.

“What is important for Dr Mackereth’s case is that the Pastoral Guidance says that transgender people should be referred to using their chosen name and pronoun. The guidance is, therefore, that Christians should not tell the truth about the biological sex of a transgender person. I think that, at the very least, in a civilised and fair society all people should accept this is, at least, a freedom of conscience issue.” (Emphases RB)

May the Lord now rapidly fulfill several prophetic visions of churches being shaken to their foundations…

Recommended, nay mandatory reading – an eye-opening expose:

The Transgender Issue is a First-Order Gospel Issue (26 Jan 2018), an introduction to which reads,

‘The Church of England bishops recently passed on responsibility for crafting liturgies celebrating gender reassignment to local clergy. This article by Carys Moseley shows that in doing this they perpetuate fundamental theological errors such as blasphemy, rebellion against God as Creator, dishonouring parents, and renaming God. The transgender pathway is shown to be a counterfeit of the Christian gospel. This will affect people’s trust in the clergy as well as the integrity of theological training…’

In considering those latter effects of the bishops’ abdication of their responsibilities, the author confesses, “This whole article has been extraordinarily difficult to write because careful investigation shows the situation of the Church of England to be catastrophic. We have there the wholesale public capitulation of an entire denomination, something truly sobering…(and it) is a first-order gospel issue. Its only hope before the Almighty God who loves us with a holy love is heartfelt repentance, and that must begin from the top down.”

Therefore, what was Synod siding with satan is now the Anglican hierarchy’s apparent subservience to it, not to our Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus. It is outright apostasy.

If a Christian doctor can be forced to deny biology, there is no hope for theology (Cranmer – click image to read)

Breaking News: landmark legal ruling for Freedom of Speech

Posted on by
2

Praise the Lord for the landmark legal ruling overturning a High Court decision and allowing Freedom of Speech, thus enabling Christians (and others) to express their belief in public and declare the fullness of scripture without fear of judicial, educational, professional or business-related censorship, intimidation and unemployment.

In A Victory For Christians Everywhere Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of Christian Concern and the Christian Legal Centre comments on the judgment handed down this week in the case of Felix Ngole, the student who was expelled from Sheffield University for expressing Biblical views on sexual ethics (emphases RB),

“I am delighted by this victory for free speech. The judges in the Court of Appeal have ruled in favour of Felix Ngole and against the university, saying that he should not have been expelled merely for expressing his Christian views. His expulsion was a serious violation of free speech that threatened Christians and others with a bar to employment for expressing what the Bible says about sexual ethics.”

‘…The university argued that even expressing Biblical views in a church, or any community where the speaker could be identified, should result in a bar to employment in social services. Even if such views were expressed in private, they would risk being reported. This amounts to endorsement by the university of something akin to a totalitarian regime where people are reported to the state authorities by informants for expressing politically incorrect views. As it was, Felix’s Facebook posts were anonymously reported to the university by someone with a clear political agenda.’

Andrea’s detailed announcement concludes,

A resounding message for freedom

‘This judgment must send a resounding message to Universities and employers across the land. Christians and others should be allowed to express their views. This is what free speech means. No one has freedom not to be offended. We must be able to disagree with tolerance, and not with silencing or bullying. Places of work, and universities in particular, should not be places where certain views are deemed politically incorrect and worthy of expulsion.

‘This judgment means that we are free to speak, free to express Christian views, to advocate for those views at university, in the classroom, and at work.

The truth sets us free

‘Christians should use our freedom of speech and unashamedly proclaim Biblical truth, however unpopular or out of fashion it may be. The truth will win out in the end. We hope that this judgment encourages Christians to be bold and fearless in expressing their Christian faith at work, at university, in church or elsewhere. All truth is found in Jesus Christ. In Colossians 1 we are told:

“For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together”.

‘The world needs the truth for in the Truth all things hold together. And it is by the Truth we are all set free.

‘Felix is exactly the kind of person that we want in social work. Today he stands vindicated; today justice has been done. But it’s not just for him; it’s for us, the Church here in the UK. Let’s ensure that this emboldens us to speak of the life-giving good news that is found in Jesus Christ.’

The Shaking: first Britain’s politicians, now Judiciary?

Posted on by
3

This morning’s politi-chatter was about  humiliating Michael Gove in the latest lap of the Conservatives election for Mrs May’s successor, for having stabbed Boris Johnson in the back during the Leave campaign. This then propelled her into power and later Gove failed to take a stand with him at Chequers when she demanded her Cabinet accept her EU deal, which subsequently led to her premiership being humiliated in not only Brexit negotiations but also the related Parliamentary voting.

According to the word Emma Stark heard from the Lord, the really good part of that is it would have been part of His strategy to deal with our pride:

“I am making some situations [to] bring nations to their knees right now, and even a humbleness to come within the British Isles”, says the Lord, “that I may break the spirit of Leviathan off you and your pride.” For the Lord says, “I cannot come near the British Isles while there is pride, because I am held by my word that says I must resist those who are proud.” But the Lord says, “As there is humbleness and as confusion even opens a door to a hands-up that says, ‘I don’t have an answer’” – and as that brings a sense of “Oh God! We need to look to you outside of ourselves” – the Lord says, “Then Leviathan breaks”, and then that revival rushes towards us.’

And of course we’re all well aware that many are associated with the ‘Pride’ movement, and politicians and some clergy trashed God’s holy ordinances. As posited in revisiting a most glowing prophecy claimed to have been for Mrs May’s premiership, her failure to stand upon scripture would have been part of her unraveling.

Therefore, the same process could apply to Michael Gove for his anti-Christian role as Lord Chancellor, head of the Judiciary. I believe the Lord may now call him to account.

The details are recounted in this Press Release Judgement in magistrate Richard Page’s case shows ‘deep intolerance’ of Christians issued by Christian Concern, emphases mine:.

‘A Christian magistrate has today lost his appeal against the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice’s decision to remove him from the judiciary.

‘In the decision by Mr Justice Choudhury, the decisions of the Employment Tribunal were upheld, ruling against his claims for discrimination and victimisation because of his Christian faith.

‘Mr Page was removed from his post as magistrate in 2015, after 15 years of exemplary service, by then Lord Chancellor Michael Gove and Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, for expressing his belief that it is in a child’s best interests to have a mother and a father.

‘Mr Page was later also blocked from returning to his position as a non-executive director of the Kent and Medway NHS Trust for having expressed the same view on a BBC Radio 4 documentary on Christians being squeezed out of public life. In a second judgment handed down this morning, the Employment Appeal Tribunal rejected Mr Page’s case against the NHS Trust, saying that it was not Mr Page’s belief but the fact that he expressed his belief that led to his removal…(!!!!)

‘Mr Page will seek to appeal these decisions, given its important ramifications for the freedom of Christians to hold and express their beliefs in public life…’ cont. reading here.

[Completed 5.00pm but left for evening class. So am pleased to learn Gove is out.]