AMERICA’s LATENT CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS:

US election’s NOT over – the numbers don’t add up! (#1. Societal equation)

In the above post of 7 July 2021 I posit an ‘Equation of National Breakdown’ which got echoes in Biden’s 2024 State of the Union address, and in that post I extended the Equation to read as follows, now with an extra Jan 6th component:

“4 year’s attempted ‘soft coup’ + sedition + rigged elections + cyber-censorship + crooked law enforcement + unjust judges + anti-Trump trials + Covid-19 vax/masks + Jan 6th kangaroo court/imprisonments + shredded records = civil war OR martial law!”

The past ten weeks post-Inauguration have seen civil war on the streets of the United States in the form of ongoing domestic terrorism against Tesla dealers and car owners – and we’re all now well aware of the extensive waste of billions of dollars by government on political purposes at home and overseas, masses of dead citizens’ votes for election fraud, and all of which this is only the tip of the iceberg…

US Constitutional Law expert Professor Jonathan Turley’s reaction:

“I’m Thoroughly Disgusted”: Democrats Attack Musk and Everything that They Once Believed in

DNC along with Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries Sue Trump Over His Effort to Prevent Illegals from Voting – Three Days After Elon Musk Reveals Millions Illegals are Registering to Vote and Were Voting

POTENTIAL JUDICIAL ‘COUP’

Further to my extensive coverage of US law and ‘lawfare’ against President Trump, this ‘civil war’ is now being engaged by rogue judges breaching the established principal of the separation of powers between the nation’s Legislature, Executive and Judiciary!

So, now note on Tuesday the authoritative testimony of renowned past Speaker of the US House of representatives, Newt Gingrich, before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence and the Internet, as well as the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, about judicial over-reach (emphases RB):

“..There is clearly a potential constitutional crisis involving the Judicial Branch’s effort to fully override the Legislative and Executive branches. (Emphasis RB)

Fifteen District Judges effectively seized control of various Executive Branch duties in the first six weeks of the current presidency through nationwide injunctions. This is potentially a judicial coup d’etat. It clearly violates the Constitution and more than 200 years of American history….

‘…Since January 20, 2025, lower courts have imposed 15 nationwide injunctions against the current Trump administration. This is compared to six during George W. Bush’s eight-years, 12 during Barack Obama’s eight years, and 14 during Joe Biden’s four-year term.

The notion that unelected lawyers can micromanage the Executive Branch – and override a Commander-in-Chief who received 77.3 million votes – should trouble every American…’

After citing significant legal turning points in US history, Newt concludes,

“This hearing is a good first step. There could be a series of hearings on the constitutional and historic framework which ensures no single branch of government can acquire dictatorial powers – specifically the Judiciary in this committee.

These hearings would educate the members and the American people. They would create a national understanding of the need to defend the Constitution against overreaching branches of government.

I would also recommend the Congress pass Chairman Issa’s ‘No Rogue Rulings Act’, which is a good signal to the Courts that they have gone too far.“

Also worthy of mention is this article by David Catron, which is directly relevant to and thereby validates the many prophecies Veronika West and Julie Green brought on the demise of US Democrat party (eg ‘Urgent Word for America…’ 8th Nov 2018):

David cites professor Jonathan Turley, known to my readers (blog latest),

‘It’s important to understand how consequential the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. Anderson really was. Jonathan Turley, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University, described it thusly: “The court’s decision was one of the most important and impactful moments in its history.” That is by no means an exaggeration. The justices all came together in order to prevent the disfranchisement of tens of millions of voters in crucial battleground states. And there can be little doubt that widespread disfranchisement was the Democrats’ goal. After years of insisting that the Electoral College is undemocratic, they tried to deprive millions of their constitutional right to cast a ballot for the candidate of their choice…’

He concludes (emphasis mine),

‘The Democrats are less in disarray than in denial. They refuse to believe they are breaking up on the rocks of a populist movement that will reduce them to splinters. They still seem to think that they can survive by insisting those rocks will crumble if they ignore the political winds that drove them to destruction.

But consider the rocks. As James Woods succinctly put it on X, “Two guys who have more money than they’ll ever need are working for NO SALARY 16 hours a day to make the lives of hard-working Americans better.” No amount of slander or demagoguery will be able to overcome this kind of genuine patriotism. The Democratic Party has long since been reduced to an empty husk that will eventually succumb to its internal rot.’

Doubtless, it’s part of the Lord’s great shaking (Hebrews 12:26) aka ‘The Storm’!