We all know yesterday’s late news:


That point on ‘mens rea’ cited above, is really an absurdity BUT should enable Trump to provide proof of election theft from the masses of investigations and collected evidence – here’s just one source >

Another example, apart from my 40-part series ‘US Election’s NOT Over‘ in the ‘2020 Election‘ category of over 400 posts, is this from retired military analyst Seth ‘Capt K’ Keshel in his latest posting The Logic Test your Trump-hating friends CAN’T and WON’T pass – Explained:
“I’ve had a bit of a riddle trapped in my brain for months now that I’ve expressed verbally from place to place, but now, thanks to the efforts of Paul Fleuret (Absolute1776), there is a graphic to explain this brain twister.
I’ve told you that in 1888, President Grover Cleveland gained votes from his first election in 1884, but lost reelection to Benjamin Harrison, making him the last incumbent President to gain votes and lose until… “the safest and most secure election of all time” in 2020.
Not only did Trump gain votes, but (also) he gained over 11 million votes, one of the highest single election jumps of all time. Incumbents who gain votes win.
Here is the brilliant graphic:”

Click above link to finish reading Seth’s brief paper – note the veritable statistics!!
A DIRECTLY TIMED WORD FROM THE LORD
📌 NOTE JULIE’S OBEDIENCE IN CHANGING PLANNED DATE FOR BROADCAST LINKED BELOW AS DIRECTED LAST WEEK BY THE LORD ‼️‼️‼️
Further snippets may be scrolled through at Richard’s Watch Telegram.














NB: EVIDENCE BEARING BIDEN’S NAME DIES “A VERY RAPID DEATH” IN FBI !






William Koenig maintains his stance against the dangers to the due democratic process of US government when reliant upon electronic voting and thus theft of votes, as in last night’s ‘














































SO Lord we pray that Your Kingdom Come and Your will be done here on earth and You bless and enable our government and people to turn back to You.








‘Below is my column in Fox.com on yesterday’s hearing with Special Counsel John Durham and the personal attacks that he faced from the Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee. Without challenging a single fact in the report as untrue, members heaped personal attacks on one of the most respected prosecutors at the Justice Department. Durham’s testimony was detached, detailed, and unbiased. He was everything that the members were not. However, one moment stood out more than the rest.’
Click to read Jonathan Turley’s 5-page article > 



