A whistle-blower’s in-depth exposures take this blog full-circle on two topics, just like wheels within wheels of a train’s engine running at full-speed momentum….

As driver, let me recap parts of the journey since leaving the siding in 2009 after being briefed on the parable of the wheat and tares (The Endgame is now in play) and taking a practice-run in the Middle-East before stopping to take on passengers 14 years ago this month. In that first year we espied the BBC’s blatant bias against Israel (here, here, here, here and here) and cited BBC Watch (now CAMERA-UK); and in summation:.

Media manipulation of thought and emotions

Then travelling to America, in addition to monitoring Obama’s foreign policy we began to pay attention to his internal politics and 2016 election, when we sensed the Lord would be exposing its corruption, as well as political rot here and in the EU. This was soon to be validated and followed in-depth (now nearly 700 exposures) as Trump’s presidency encountered deep opposition with injunctions based upon now proven sedition.

Readers may recall my disdain of BBC as Brussels Broadcasting Club and as Britain’s Brainwashing Cult. Moreover, it supports and promulgates terrorist propaganda!

Now, this morning by way of ‘God-incidental’ confirmation on Facebook (video at PS)

Monday’s explosive news reported next, should not have surprised my subscribers or Telegram and Facebook friends who’d recall this blog’s extensive in-depth cover of the rally and march to the US Capitol on 6th January 2021.

But I hope it has shocked folk who’d swallowed mendacious MainStream Media lies hook, line and sinker.  As ‘prince of the power of the air’ (Ephesians 2,2), satan had prompted many Christians to accept MSM pronouncements about Donald Trump and thus speak of him contemptuously, even whilst addressing congregations!

BBC BIAS DOSSIER – TRUMP

Daily Telegraph’s Associate Editor Gordon Rayner opens his 8-page report with brief comparison videos and he writes (emphases mine),

‘The BBC doctored a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph.

A Panorama programme, broadcast a week before the US election, “completely misled” viewers by showing the president telling supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to “fight like hell”, when in fact he said he would walk with them “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”.

The “mangled” footage was highlighted in a 19-page dossier on BBC bias, which was compiled by a recent member of the corporation’s standards committee and is now circulating in government departments.

The dossier said the programme made the US president “‘say’ things [he] never actually said” by splicing together footage from the start of his speech with something he said nearly an hour later.

It claimed senior executives and the BBC’s chairman had ignored and dismissed a string of serious complaints raised by the corporation’s own standards watchdog.

Donald Trump Jr, the president’s eldest son, accused the BBC of dishonesty and “fake news”. He reposted The Telegraph’s story on X, writing: “The FAKE NEWS ‘reporters’ in the UK are just as dishonest and full of s— as the ones here in America!!!!”

‘…The document raises serious questions about the culture at the BBC, how it affects impartiality and how managers including Tim Davie, the director-general, are accused of turning a blind eye to evidence of bias...’

…..‘Nigel Huddleston, the shadow culture secretary, said: “These are extremely concerning revelations that could seriously undermine the brand and reputation of the BBC. The BBC licence fee is justified on the basis of impartiality and trust.

“There can be no justification for this kind of deliberate manipulation and the spreading of misinformation. “This is not the first time that evidence of bias at the BBC has emerged, but it is one of the most stark and alarming examples to date.

“Licence-fee payers deserve an immediate explanation and apology from the BBC and a thorough investigation into this scandal must take place.”

The most damaging disclosures involve a one-hour Panorama special called ‘Trump: A Second Chance?’ that was broadcast in October last year.

As well as altering Mr Trump’s words, the documentary also showed flag-waving men marching on the Capitol in Washington DC on Jan 6 2021 after the president spoke, which “created the impression Trump’s supporters had taken up his ‘call to arms’”. In fact the footage, was shot before Mr Trump had even started speaking.

The report said Panorama’s “distortion of the day’s events” was so egregious that viewers would ask: “Why should the BBC be trusted, and where will this all end?”

When the issue was raised with managers, they “refused to accept there had been a breach of standards”. The report’s author then warned Samir Shah, the BBC chairman, of the “very, very dangerous precedent” set by Panorama but received no reply.’

…..‘Former BBC radio presenter Liz Kershaw said on X: “This is no surprise to me. I presented news and current affairs programmes on the BBC on four stations from 1993 to 2011. The biased groupthink among its journalists was outrageous and had to be fought and rebalanced every day.”

…..’The report on BBC bias was written by Michael Prescott, who spent three years as an independent external adviser to the broadcaster’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee (EGSC) before leaving the role in June….a former journalist who has worked in a series of corporate advisory roles, (Mr P ) said in a covering letter sent with his dossier, which is now circulating in Whitehall and has been seen by The Telegraph, that he had been moved to act because of his “despair at inaction by the BBC Executive when issues come to light”.

He sent the dossier to the BBC Board because repeated warnings to the EGSC were “dismissed or ignored”.

Mr Prescott wrote in the letter: “I departed [from the advisory role] with profound and unresolved concerns about the BBC…my view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all.”

….’The hour-long Panorama special called ‘Trump: A Second Chance?’ was aired on Oct 28 last year.

Mr Prescott, one of two independent editorial advisers sitting on the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee at the time, watched the programme and was struck by its “distinctly anti-Trump stance”, with 10 Trump critics featured against just one supporter. [RB: Similarly as in US monitored by Sharyl Attkisson – below.]

He said he was “shocked” to discover there was no similar programme examining the record of Kamala Harris, Mr Trump’s presidential rival.

Mr Prescott raised concerns with the EGSC and David Grossman, the senior editorial adviser to the committee, was asked to review the programme…(he) “highlighted alarming concerns about how Panorama had edited Trump’s speech to his supporters” on Jan 6 2021.

Mr Prescott wrote: “Examining the charge that Trump had incited protesters to storm Capitol Hill, it turned out that Panorama had spliced together two clips from separate parts of his speech. This created the impression that Trump said something he did not and, in doing so, materially misled viewers.”

…(He) said in his report: “It was completely misleading to edit the clip in the way Panorama aired it. The fact that [Mr Trump] did not explicitly exhort supporters to go down and fight at Capitol Hill was one of the reasons there were no federal charges for incitement to riot.”

Investigator Sharyl Attkisson’s Definitive List of Media Mistakes in the Trump Era (181) relating to MSM in United States has been updated .

BBC BIAS DOSSIER – ISRAEL

Gordon Rayner begins the Dossier’s next part of 12 pages,

The BBC’s Arabic news service chose to “minimise Israeli suffering” in the war in Gaza so it could “paint Israel as the aggressor”, according to an internal report by a whistle-blower.

Allegations made against Israel were “raced to air” without adequate checks, the memo says, suggesting either carelessness or “a desire always to believe the worst about Israel”.

BBC Arabic, which is funded partly by a grant from the Foreign Office, gave large amounts of space to statements from Hamas, making its editorial slant “considerably different” to the main BBC website even though it is supposed to reflect the same values, managers were warned.

The BBC also gave “unjustifiable weight” to Hamas claims about the death toll in Gaza, which are widely accepted to have been exaggerated for propaganda purposes, and incorrectly claimed the International Court of Justice had ruled that genocide was taking place.

Danny Cohen, the former director of BBC Television, said it was now clear that the BBC was “not safe” in the hands of its senior managers and they should “hang their heads in shame and resign”.’

And that’s just the start of his 12-page report Arabic Bias Pushed Hama Lies..!

LATEST:

Headline escalated four hours later as follows:

:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/05/lord-grade-ofcom-bbc-bias-inquiry/

PS: