A LAWLESS SOCIETY
I apologise in advance for the length of this email, but I believe it contains very important information about how we and the church have been deceived into obeying government acts that should not be obeyed.
Do you remember Chris Wickland’s
prophecy where the Lord states that we live in a lawless society? This was the one which he got before he had the heart attack which should have been fatal.
I have been musing over this statement and I can now confirm that we really do live in a lawless society.
You may or may not remember that I am involved in an interminable employment tribunal case (now 6 years and counting). The problem is that I lack capacity to litigate because I cannot cope with hearings (issues with complex oral communication, deliberate lies and deception, intent to deceive). Judges have been refusing to apply the law around this and instead are trying to trick me into doing things that ensures the law does not apply.
I am now understanding that all this is because the Lord wants me to understand deception and to understand the root cause of why we live in a lawless society. I had a dream at towards the end of 2019 for which the interpretation was that the Lord wanted me to be able to recognise deception. The tribunal case has certainly helped with that, but there is more. I have always felt that after this, I will get a harder assignment. That assignment is now starting to take shape, but more on that another time.
Back to the lawless society.
I have it on good authority in writing from the president of the employment tribunal that discrimination, dishonesty and deliberate bias are NOT misconduct on the part of a judge. That is very scary. Judges are accountable to no one and can therefore act as they like. This is also very scary.
This is enough to make us a lawless society and gives us good reason to fear being involved in the legal system, but there is more.
It appears that ‘we the people’ appear to have been bound over to slavery via trickery and government acts. We comply with what the government tells us because of trickery and fear.
To give an example, I was recently in Edinburgh. There the coast road has a 20 mile an hour limit along much of its length. I do my best to stick to that limit, not because I think it is a sensible limit, but for fear of getting a speeding fine. Note the word ‘fear’.
But it turns out that nobody is obliged to pay a speeding fine, or a ULEZ fine or similar. We are all tricked into agreeing to do so.
There is a difference between commercial law and common law. Common law is ancient law and essentially means that we should not cause nor threaten harm, loss or injury to another living soul or their property. Fraud is included in this. That sounds reasonable.
Then there is commercial law that you would think should be between only commercial entities. But this is not the case.
makes it clear that a corporation is a ‘legal person’. This actually has to be the case otherwise you cannot sue any corporation for discrimination, for example. Abstract entities cannot discriminate. Only a ‘person’ can. This is what is known as a ‘legal fiction’. This is easy to find out.
But it gets weirder. If you look up the legal definitions of ‘litigant’, ‘party’, ‘person’, there is no distinction made between living, men, women, boys and girls and corporations. (I can’t say ‘person’ now because that is a corporation).
It appears that what happens is that when our births are registered, a corporation is created in our name – our ‘legal fiction’. Your birth certificate has a number. This legal fiction is a ‘person’, which is a corporation. It isn’t you.
But you need your legal fiction to open a bank account, own a car, buy insurance, obtain a passport, buy (or rent) property.
But any speeding or ULEZ fines are also aimed at your legal fiction. But we are dealing with commercial law which is all about contracts. So when you get sent one of these things, you are being tricked into entering into a contract. You actually have the right to decline the invitation to enter into that contract – you have the right to not consent.
It appears that this all hinges on the ‘cestui que vie’ act of 1666. Note the year. It is beyond the scope of this email, but investigate freemasonry and you will find occult. You will also discover that freemasonry is rife in parliament, the legal system, the police, the army and probably many other places as well. Find out and draw your own conclusions.
Why would the government include this on their website if it wasn’t important? Is every act for the last 400 years and more been transcribed and entered onto the government website?
This act appears innocuous. It is about nobody being able to claim your property if you are away overseas or lost at sea and there is no contact from you. Seems good right?
I have not been able to find anything much other about this but I suspect that the issue is in the implementation. You need a (public) record of what somebody owns. A database if you like. Your database record is not you. But computers and databases didn’t exist in 1666. So what if the government created ‘legal fictions’ for everyone and the record of the property was attached to that? To make it all fit into ‘law’, it would perhaps have been easy to make this legal fiction a corporation.
Whether this was done with nefarious reasons at the time, I do not know, but it would not surprise me.
But this means that because or legal fictions are corporations, commercial law applies to us. Commercial law is all about contracts and breach of contract.
But this appears to have been used to force people to pay tax, council tax, speeding fines, and comply with insane covid rules, suppress free speech (non crime hate crimes) – all out of fear. It appear that this has been turned into a tool to bind us all into slavery because of fear. This is done by tricking us into to agreeing to enter contracts. There is a reason why contracts do not have to be written and signed, but can simply be assumed.
This means that as soon as you land in a court of law that is not common law, you are actually representing your legal fiction, a corporation. If it is against a commercial enterprise then you are also using the legal fiction that this is a ‘person’. Therefore the basis of the case is already not based on reality. No wonder judges cannot engage in simple and straightforward communication!
Essentially our legal system is rotten to the core. I used to think that all we needed to do was to inject honesty and integrity into it. But no: that won’t work. We have to scrap the whole edifice, go back to common law and start again. Our legal system is rotten to the core and that is why we live in a lawless society.
Government acts actually govern contracts between ‘persons’ which are corporations. They do not apply to living men, women, girls, and boys. This means that if you (a living soul) get a speeding or ULEZ fine through the post, the police are actually offering to enter a contract with you. You are tricked into entering into that contract. ULEZ and similar fines, in particular are nothing by racketeering. They have no basis in fact.
You can also offer to enter into the contact conditionally if certain facts can be established. With this commercial enterprises, don’t have to pay these fines either.
This also applies to the covid act, which was actually never valid because ‘covid’ was downgraded to a disease of no consequence before the act was enacted. There was no legal basis on which to enforce this act and compliance was enforced by fear and propaganda.
There was no requirement for any church or living soul to go along with it. We were all deceived.
It is clear that government officials knew it was all nonsense. That is why they did not follow their own rules. I don’t actually know for sure that they even paid the fines. That might have been a show too.
So because of this deception and (legitimate) fear of being sued, we and the church are all slaves to the government.
I think living souls and churches need to know this. We are supposed to be children of God – not slaves of the government.
What we think is ‘law’ actually isn’t.
By the way, I am not advocating not paying taxes, though we probably have a good argument that to do so is illegal because it is funding a criminal cartel. However, I want to pay taxes to fund a government where honesty and integrity is valued, and where the members have the aim of working for the benefit of living souls rather than very powerful commercial entities.
In order to change the world for the better, we need to understand what has gone wrong. I am working on that in more areas. Wilberforce, did not sit and pray for slavery to end, he took real action and paid the price for that action. But in the end, slavery was abolished.
We the people have more power than we think. The powers that be are terrified that we will realise this and take action. Of course, as Christians we need to be led by God as to what action to take when. This is important to avoid civil unrest (or to avoid as much civil unrest as possible).
Kind regards,
Elizabeth
NB: EVIDENCE BEARING BIDEN’S NAME DIES “A VERY RAPID DEATH” IN FBI !
HOWEVER, note very carefully Paul – and Holy Spirit’s – clearly implicit caveat in verses 3-4 (underscored):
‘Below is my column in Fox.com on yesterday’s hearing with Special Counsel John Durham and the personal attacks that he faced from the Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee. Without challenging a single fact in the report as untrue, members heaped personal attacks on one of the most respected prosecutors at the Justice Department. Durham’s testimony was detached, detailed, and unbiased. He was everything that the members were not. However, one moment stood out more than the rest.’
Click to read Jonathan Turley’s 5-page article > 
Richard's Watch 