
DoJ/IRS interfered in investigations of Biden family crimes (PPU #72) – Clever Journeys
Reply


My apologies for not noticing link to article by Jonathan Turley didn’t work. Here is a better link
‘Below is my column in Fox.com on yesterday’s hearing with Special Counsel John Durham and the personal attacks that he faced from the Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee. Without challenging a single fact in the report as untrue, members heaped personal attacks on one of the most respected prosecutors at the Justice Department. Durham’s testimony was detached, detailed, and unbiased. He was everything that the members were not. However, one moment stood out more than the rest.’
Click to read Jonathan Turley’s 5-page article > https://jonathanturley.org/2023/06/22/you-will-end-up-on-the-bottom-of-a-pyre-democrats-attack-special-counsel-john-durham/
WE BREAK THAT CURSE IN THE MIGHTY NAME ABOVE ALL NAMES, THAT OF JESUS CHRIST, THE SON OF LIVING GOD!

Not so, if you believe there’s no such thing as coincidence, especially when it’s just like another piece of the Lord’s Invisible Jigsaw ‘God-incidentally’ falling into place. So 3 days later let me try to recap what happened over Friday-Saturday, for readers not on Facebook or visiting my Telegram channel. (For info, these are much easier for sharing but far prefer this blog for being more personal.)
For my brain’s sake (in hols-mode a week later!) over afternoon cuppa, a quick recap of pieces that popped into place last week:
THEN: is Trump himself a special CHS (Confidential Human Source) for the FBI, as in the MUST-read I left with you that concludes by asking (emphases mine):
‘… Are you seeing the pattern yet? When it comes to Trump’s status relating to the DOJ/FBI, the agencies routinely cite the same exemption (or the Glomar Response) to presumably maintain a person’s privacy or the confidentiality of ongoing investigation. Either way, IF (perhaps a very big IF) Donald J Trump is still an FBI CHS this would explain the government’s position.
What are they protecting and what are they trying to hide? The Glomar response is interesting because it reminds me of the military treatment we were expected to give to Secret and Top Secret operations: I can neither confirm nor deny. When an operation is no longer active, we can comment on such things, otherwise its “I can neither confirm nor deny.” Something about Trump’s status with the FBI/DOJ is active and being covered up. They are creating a black hole of information around Donald J Trump.’
THIS MATCHES CLAIMS ABOUT CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT, as in my previous postings on this matter as Devolution Theory investigated by Jon Herold (aka Patel Patriot) and team, and Derek Johnson’s voluminous writings based upon his ‘Blueprint’ published at 1776 Nation The Documents website.
2. THEREFORE, imagine how bemused I became at the beginning of our long weekend upon spotting this early on Friday 16th :


This long piece on primacy of US Military Law over Federal and States’ laws and presumed Military Operation closes as follows and still shows my comment:

3. Then the next day the third BIG piece of the puzzle fell into place and I began to perceive the picture and shared this:


MOREOVER, I’d found that President Trump himself had already used a triplet:




Let’s close with his close associate and Deputy Assistant Kash Patel and former Chief of Staff for DoD – as well as ‘RussiaGate Guy’!

[Puzzle In Sky by Idea Go, courtesy Freedigitalphotos.net]
PS. Wanted to get this ‘done and dusted’ as quickly as poss but our washing machine stopped working and had to empty water and hang-ring sheets. After changing its fuse it’s apparently back in working order but it took me away for about 45 minutes and then I found ‘double-Q’ publication time of 17:17 arrived upon inserting final image! I kid you not!
In catching up with email I read a well-explained and documented theory published on Biernutz_71’s Substack under the title Trump’s Event Horizon. It comes with my high recommendation as a MUST-READ.

His thesis makes compelling reading and provocative conclusions regarding the FBI… and see latest from Margot Cleveland..all for some good weekend reading 🙂

Enjoy…
PS: CHS ,= Confidential Human Source

Now for a selection of items, not all on my ongoing news/opinion coverage on Richard’s Watch Telegram, or necessarily in chronological order, before we home in on an insight adding further possible understanding of events:
First, another dose of double 2’s from the exceptionally knowledgeable military veteran Derek Johnson in this notable statement – and LOL I unwittingly took a double shot too!:


Now back to last weekend with headlines from renowned professor of law and attorney before proceeding through a tranche of items: Continue reading
After re-blogging Texan Jack’s latest I spotted this damning directly relevant item on Telegram:

FYI here’s that link > https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1668420416203784195.html

PPS (12:52)


“Last month, a whistle-blower brought to light the existence in the FBI of a report, an FD-1023, in which the informant alleges that President Biden and his family members engaged in a $5 million bribery scheme during his time as vice president,” Texas Senator Ted Cruz presented to FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate during a Senate hearing being held as the Biden Regime was arresting former President Donald Trump on more bogus charges in Florida.
Continue reading Texan Jack’ Dennis’ brief incisive account with video at See Ted Cruz Obliterate FBI Deputy-Director for blowing away Biden Burisma bribe evidence.
Watch the astonishing 6 minutes video of Sen Cruz’s thorough trashing and scathing denunciation of the FBI, Jack concludes with:
“This is why you are damaging the institution,” Cruz countered when Abbate refused to answer, adding “The American people have a right to know whether there is serious, credible evidence that the president of the United States took a $5 million bribe.”
“The FBI has right now unlimited hubris,” Cruz charged, adding “you believe you are unaccountable. You won’t believe you are accountable to the U.S. Congress or the American people. And you are doing damage.”
NB: Eight years-old post re-published at 08:08 hours BST on 808th anniversary, further to Tuesday’s post on ‘‘Soviet-style’ vs Anglo Saxon law. Note also Postscript below.

12th Century manuscript Textus Roffensis – Credit: Cambridge Historical Encyclopedia of Great Britain and Ireland (publ 1985)
Today, 15 June 2015, marks the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta to which King John affixed his seal under the demands of his barons in order to limit his regal powers. There’s more I want to tell about this than was briefly covered in the preamble to prophetical points of last month’s general election.
Also, whilst writing I’m intrigued to have received a reader’s unwitting contribution that’s made me suspect some pieces of the Lord’s invisible jigsaw are falling into place!
[Section on numbers has been revised and appears in next post: A Better Perspective.]
To recap, I noted this medieval document, “Established for the first time the principle that everybody, including the king, was subject to the common law of the land. The British Library states that, although nearly a third of the text was deleted or substantially rewritten within ten years, and almost all its clauses have been repealed in modern times, Magna Carta still remains a cornerstone of the British constitution. I’d add that its great influence extends to the Commonwealth’s and to the United States of America’s legal systems.”
In view of this lengthy document’s importance in world history may I encourage you to consider a few more points gleaned from my weekend reading? (To read the articles in full and for more information then click the links shown.) Continue reading
For my fuller coverage of news items and informed opinions since our return from holiday visit Richard’s Watch Telegram (has visitors’ preview facility).
When getting a newspaper for first time in a fortnight, Saturday’s revealed it just could NOT be coincidental that major political and legal developments had exploded against two fair-haired former leaders of allied nations on opposite sides of the North Atlantic – both had strong connotations of organised ‘kangaroo court’ action:

Bojo’s long-time friend and columnist Daniel writes:





Albeit usually well-balanced and informed, The Daily Telegraph’s correspondents do not report as fully as our American non-MSM sources, but today a previous Editor Charles Moore states (emphasis mine) in his op-ed Notebook Boris isn’t the only one to blame for this mess:
...This country has now imported from the United States a mania for destroying elected politicians by means other than the ballot box. We saw it used unsuccessfully against Bill Clinton in the 1990s and against Donald Trump recently. It is unhealthy.
Part of the problem is the readiness with which accusations against political leaders are believed. Take the case of Nicola Sturgeon…yes, Ms Sturgeon has been arrested, interviewed by the police and released pending further investigation. But, so far, no charges have been brought against her and she has been convicted of nothing. It is important to hold on to the most basic principle of “innocent until proved guilty”.
On that legal point, basic since the days of King Alfred the Great and Anglo-Saxon laws based upon the Bible and subsequent Magna Carta (about which I blogged on its 800th anniversary and upon which America once took pride in basing its laws!), Tom Fitton President of renowned Judicial Watch HITS THE NAIL ON THE HEAD herein:



That is, it is another validation of Veronika West’s dream vision of Biden cheating in a stadium race for the November 2020 presidential election.
PS. Just seen this which confirms Biden family complicity in this crime – click image for link:
Although not directly related to the then emerging ‘Lockdown Files‘ and current revival of rank hypocrisy in ex-PM Boris Johnson’s ‘Partygate’ and prevailing stupidity within our politicians, government and administrative services, this most interesting item raised a month ago is worth careful consideration. (And the Tory’s crazy action expelling the honest MP Andrew Bridgen is part and parcel of Big Brother!!)
‘Coincidentally’ email on my pc had crashed, so I resorted to poking my phone’s tiny squares in replying to Dr Elizabeth!
These legal aspects are most interesting because I was given a 3-day intensive course on the Law of Contract for administrating contracts in the Ministry of Public Buildings and Works!! I enjoyed the detail and it gave an excellent background, enabling me to appreciate the finer points of consumer laws.
Additionally, it may connect into US law relating to the District of Columbia being a corporation and not a federal state, even though it’s the location of the capital of the United States. (US law is supposedly based upon ours and Magna Carta principles!)
Please bear with tight formatting carried-over in copying. Elizabeth writes:
A LAWLESS SOCIETYI apologise in advance for the length of this email, but I believe it contains very important information about how we and the church have been deceived into obeying government acts that should not be obeyed.Do you remember Chris Wickland’s prophecy where the Lord states that we live in a lawless society? This was the one which he got before he had the heart attack which should have been fatal.I have been musing over this statement and I can now confirm that we really do live in a lawless society.You may or may not remember that I am involved in an interminable employment tribunal case (now 6 years and counting). The problem is that I lack capacity to litigate because I cannot cope with hearings (issues with complex oral communication, deliberate lies and deception, intent to deceive). Judges have been refusing to apply the law around this and instead are trying to trick me into doing things that ensures the law does not apply.I am now understanding that all this is because the Lord wants me to understand deception and to understand the root cause of why we live in a lawless society. I had a dream at towards the end of 2019 for which the interpretation was that the Lord wanted me to be able to recognise deception. The tribunal case has certainly helped with that, but there is more. I have always felt that after this, I will get a harder assignment. That assignment is now starting to take shape, but more on that another time.Back to the lawless society.I have it on good authority in writing from the president of the employment tribunal that discrimination, dishonesty and deliberate bias are NOT misconduct on the part of a judge. That is very scary. Judges are accountable to no one and can therefore act as they like. This is also very scary.This is enough to make us a lawless society and gives us good reason to fear being involved in the legal system, but there is more.It appears that ‘we the people’ appear to have been bound over to slavery via trickery and government acts. We comply with what the government tells us because of trickery and fear.To give an example, I was recently in Edinburgh. There the coast road has a 20 mile an hour limit along much of its length. I do my best to stick to that limit, not because I think it is a sensible limit, but for fear of getting a speeding fine. Note the word ‘fear’.But it turns out that nobody is obliged to pay a speeding fine, or a ULEZ fine or similar. We are all tricked into agreeing to do so.There is a difference between commercial law and common law. Common law is ancient law and essentially means that we should not cause nor threaten harm, loss or injury to another living soul or their property. Fraud is included in this. That sounds reasonable.Then there is commercial law that you would think should be between only commercial entities. But this is not the case.The government website – ‘Companies Act 2006’ https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/790C/2015-05-26.makes it clear that a corporation is a ‘legal person’. This actually has to be the case otherwise you cannot sue any corporation for discrimination, for example. Abstract entities cannot discriminate. Only a ‘person’ can. This is what is known as a ‘legal fiction’. This is easy to find out.But it gets weirder. If you look up the legal definitions of ‘litigant’, ‘party’, ‘person’, there is no distinction made between living, men, women, boys and girls and corporations. (I can’t say ‘person’ now because that is a corporation).It appears that what happens is that when our births are registered, a corporation is created in our name – our ‘legal fiction’. Your birth certificate has a number. This legal fiction is a ‘person’, which is a corporation. It isn’t you.But you need your legal fiction to open a bank account, own a car, buy insurance, obtain a passport, buy (or rent) property.But any speeding or ULEZ fines are also aimed at your legal fiction. But we are dealing with commercial law which is all about contracts. So when you get sent one of these things, you are being tricked into entering into a contract. You actually have the right to decline the invitation to enter into that contract – you have the right to not consent.For more information see thepeopleslawyeruk.com , ukcolumn.org among others (if you can find the time – or delegate to someone else).It appears that this all hinges on the ‘cestui que vie’ act of 1666. Note the year. It is beyond the scope of this email, but investigate freemasonry and you will find occult. You will also discover that freemasonry is rife in parliament, the legal system, the police, the army and probably many other places as well. Find out and draw your own conclusions.The cestui que vie act (suspiciously) can be found on the government website: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/18-19/11Why would the government include this on their website if it wasn’t important? Is every act for the last 400 years and more been transcribed and entered onto the government website?This act appears innocuous. It is about nobody being able to claim your property if you are away overseas or lost at sea and there is no contact from you. Seems good right?I have not been able to find anything much other about this but I suspect that the issue is in the implementation. You need a (public) record of what somebody owns. A database if you like. Your database record is not you. But computers and databases didn’t exist in 1666. So what if the government created ‘legal fictions’ for everyone and the record of the property was attached to that? To make it all fit into ‘law’, it would perhaps have been easy to make this legal fiction a corporation.Whether this was done with nefarious reasons at the time, I do not know, but it would not surprise me.But this means that because or legal fictions are corporations, commercial law applies to us. Commercial law is all about contracts and breach of contract.But this appears to have been used to force people to pay tax, council tax, speeding fines, and comply with insane covid rules, suppress free speech (non crime hate crimes) – all out of fear. It appear that this has been turned into a tool to bind us all into slavery because of fear. This is done by tricking us into to agreeing to enter contracts. There is a reason why contracts do not have to be written and signed, but can simply be assumed.This means that as soon as you land in a court of law that is not common law, you are actually representing your legal fiction, a corporation. If it is against a commercial enterprise then you are also using the legal fiction that this is a ‘person’. Therefore the basis of the case is already not based on reality. No wonder judges cannot engage in simple and straightforward communication!Essentially our legal system is rotten to the core. I used to think that all we needed to do was to inject honesty and integrity into it. But no: that won’t work. We have to scrap the whole edifice, go back to common law and start again. Our legal system is rotten to the core and that is why we live in a lawless society.Government acts actually govern contracts between ‘persons’ which are corporations. They do not apply to living men, women, girls, and boys. This means that if you (a living soul) get a speeding or ULEZ fine through the post, the police are actually offering to enter a contract with you. You are tricked into entering into that contract. ULEZ and similar fines, in particular are nothing by racketeering. They have no basis in fact.You can also offer to enter into the contact conditionally if certain facts can be established. With this commercial enterprises, don’t have to pay these fines either.This also applies to the covid act, which was actually never valid because ‘covid’ was downgraded to a disease of no consequence before the act was enacted. There was no legal basis on which to enforce this act and compliance was enforced by fear and propaganda.There was no requirement for any church or living soul to go along with it. We were all deceived.It is clear that government officials knew it was all nonsense. That is why they did not follow their own rules. I don’t actually know for sure that they even paid the fines. That might have been a show too.So because of this deception and (legitimate) fear of being sued, we and the church are all slaves to the government.I think living souls and churches need to know this. We are supposed to be children of God – not slaves of the government.What we think is ‘law’ actually isn’t.By the way, I am not advocating not paying taxes, though we probably have a good argument that to do so is illegal because it is funding a criminal cartel. However, I want to pay taxes to fund a government where honesty and integrity is valued, and where the members have the aim of working for the benefit of living souls rather than very powerful commercial entities.In order to change the world for the better, we need to understand what has gone wrong. I am working on that in more areas. Wilberforce, did not sit and pray for slavery to end, he took real action and paid the price for that action. But in the end, slavery was abolished.We the people have more power than we think. The powers that be are terrified that we will realise this and take action. Of course, as Christians we need to be led by God as to what action to take when. This is important to avoid civil unrest (or to avoid as much civil unrest as possible).Kind regards,Elizabeth
On Sunday my mind’s eye was filled with an image of a GINORMOUS BICYCLE, the wheels of which span the Atlantic but as though on a treadmill. The front, leading wheel is standing here in the British Isles and the rear wheel ‘follows’ by standing over the United States – and each bears a particular pattern relating to a period of FIVE days, wherein the final day has two events!!
(I was reminded of Veronika West’s vision of owl’s eyes, hence my featuring on this home-page.)
First, a reminder of the Conclusion to GPS #96.3 How ‘Jigsaw Piece’ on Romans 1 & 2 Plugs into Prophecy-related News:
Thus, we have a double confirmation of the importance of Romans 1 reference to God’s Wrath, as given by Andrew’s prophetic dream and its actual timing which got confirmed 5 days later in Verse of the Day being Romans 11:33 – and we had 5 ‘jigsaw-pieces’!
That proved prescient, if not prophetic.
To recap from GPS#96.1 (Stunned by ‘Invisible Jigsaw’ of Scripture re Prophecies and News) those ‘pieces’ covering a period of 5 days here in the UK, (twice on Wednesday)
As told in the last part (GPS #96.3) 11:33 is not only that verse number but is also the time-point when Andrew Whalen begins speaking about God revealing Himself as Judge and God of Wrath (as discussed here in UK last Saturday week.) …But now this weekend…
YET AGAIN I WAS STUNNED, by this headline regarding FIVE events in FIVE DAYS in USA, viz:

(Click here for to read COMPELLING DETAILS in advert-free, print friendly version.)
ALSO the connection between the two ‘wheels’ of 5-day is something I hadn’t said previously: that is, the reason for Tim Shey’s drawing my attention to Andrew Whalen’s discussion with Steve Shultz on Elijah Streams is his prophetic reference in 2020 to exposing Clinton.
RELEVANT NEWS (In case you may be unaware):



(Click here for to read advert-free, print friendly version.)



(Click here to read Roger Stone’s Substack)
Just finished and published at 17:55 (make of that what you may, but it’s dinner-time !)
PS.

Below is my column in The Messenger, the new digital news platform created by Jimmy Finkelstein (the former owner of The Hill). Finkelstein’s signature has always been balanced publications where all viewpoints are represented and objectivity remains the touchstone for reporters. That puts him at odds with the “advocacy journalism” model sweeping other publications. T he start of the new platform is good news for many of us who believe that the media is facing an existential choice in the coming years Durham Report Condemns the FBI’s Russia Probe — But Don’t Expect It to Make a Difference — JONATHAN TURLEY
In view of the prophetic vision 7 years go this month of falling dominoes that motivated my mulling upon the Lord exposing political corruption (and hundreds of subsequent post herein), and the current extensive ‘ripple-effect’ mentioned by ‘digital warriors’, I have doubts about the law professor’s morose conclusion.
In fact, Jonathan appears to have become more strident in his analytically objective criticism, as may be gathered from the following extract
AND bear in mind the 10-point details of Veronika West’s stadium race dream wherein she saw Biden setting off early in the 2020 election race and MSM declaring him the winner – even though he cheated and should have been disqualified by officials!
Jonathan Turley writes (emphases mine):
‘In the 305-page report released Monday, special counsel John Durham concluded that the Trump-Russia investigation was launched without a required minimal level of evidence and shattered a host of departmental standards. Let that sink in: The Justice Department — as well as the media that covered it — effectively shut down a duly elected presidency, based on what turned out to be a politically engineered hoax.
That would make anyone angry. Really angry. Trump-level angry.
The fact is, in this instance, Donald Trump was correct when he said he was the target of a political hit-job funded by the Clinton campaign and maintained by virtually every media outlet. There is a word for that: disinformation.
Democrats such as former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff of California have pushed for censorship by claiming that disinformation is a threat to democracy. Well, this is that threat — the real one. This actually left an administration mired in a faux scandal for years, with high-ranking officials paraded before grand juries and their guilt then proclaimed nightly on cable news shows.
Even after the Mueller investigation found insufficient evidence of collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, Rep. Schiff assured the public in March 2018, that “I can certainly say with confidence that there is significant evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia” and he repeatedly promised to reveal it in his committee.
He never did, of course. Instead, he regularly criticized Durham’s investigation and called for it to end, to prevent this report from ever being released.
Others on the intelligence committee, like Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), also insisted there was clear evidence of collusion. No less a figure than Obama’s former national intelligence director James Clapper suggested Trump was a Russian “asset.”
Reasonable people would expect ALL participants to be held accountable for treason against a sitting President of the United States – I’m just saying!
NOTE WELL: Obama-Biden-Clinton-FBI plotting affected TWO presidential elections! Their attempts to thwart Trump’s candidacy and the results of the 2016 election was repeated four years later by FBI’s suppressing incriminating evidence against the Biden family in 2020
Thoroughly detailed reports and information about on the Mueller investigation may be found on this search link with LaRouch PAC – NB. It covers British role in the allegation.
[BTW, unintentionally finished in double-cue time at 17:17!]
I have columns out today on the release of the long-awaited report from John Durham on the Russian collusion investigation, including on the new Messenger site.
However, I wanted to post the report itself below. As expected, it is a scathing indictment of the Clinton campaign, the FBI, and the media for one of the most successful political hit jobs in history.
The report shreds the FBI and Justice Department for abandoning standards and ignoring the lack of evidence to launch and prolong the investigation. The report notes that the treatment of the unsubstantiated allegations in the Steele Dossier, funded by the Clinton Campaign, was “markedly different” from the government’s level of interest in Clinton’s campaign when it faced such allegations.
This is 400th posting on ‘Exposures’ and I note Professor Turley’s response to FBI’s reaction referring to its past actions:
“Missteps” is hardly how one would describe a false narrative promulgated by a campaign and perpetuated by the FBI or the derailing of a duly elected president for three years in a faux conspiracy. The statement is ample evidence of a lack of remorse by the FBI like a habitual offender giving a shrug in his court “allocution” before a judge.
His post has generated an interesting discussion thread…

The House of Representatives and the Biden Administration appear in a staring contest waiting for any sign of Blinken. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) warned Secretary of State Antony Blinken that the House Foreign Affairs Committee is moving to hold him in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoena requests related to the United States withdrawal from Afghanistan.
There is no question that the Committee has a legitimate oversight interest in the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan at a huge loss of life, abandonment of thousands of allies, and seven billion dollars in military equipment. [.…] Blinken Contest: House Committee Prepares to Hold Secretary of State in Contempt — JONATHAN TURLEY
Yes, Prophecy Progress Updates keep on rolling thick and fast…Tomorrow I’ll post a link to in-depth investigation connecting this matter to Devolution Theory, aka Continuity of Government.

Cocky and somewhat incoherent, Joe Biden continues to do what he is told. From sitting in the basement during 2020 election season to dutifully reading Obiden teleprompters in a fake White House set, the walls seem to be closing in on Biden, and his son, Hunter.
“The federal bureaucracy’s heretofore impenetrable cone of silence that has protected Joe Biden from prosecution for serial betrayals of his office and our country has now been breached by a whistle-blower from the Internal Revenue Service,” said Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. Executive Chairman, Center for Security Policy. “Thank God!” […]
Now, news relating to prophecies of China’s subtle war (Kim Clement 2014), exposures of political rot and corruption (yours truly 2016) and of whistle-blowers, as brought by several others.
CRIME FAMILY: James Comer Identifies the NINE Bidens Who are Implicated in Corruption (VIDEO)
Comer: “Bank Records Show the Biden Family, Their Associates, and Their Companies Received Over $10 Million From Foreign Nationals” (VIDEO)
A number of news items/opinions relevant to prophecies published herein on America, especially on electoral repercussions of Veronika West’s Stadium Race vision of Biden cheating in the 2020 election, may be read on Richard’s Watch Prophecy Validations on Telegram (non-subscribers select pre-view option). Here’s the latest:

Advert-free, printer-friendly version > https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/zuYBMB

Advert-free, printer-friendly version > https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/eViL4P
And on Richard’s Watch Telegram:



Here’s an interesting ‘Q-drop’ forecast relating to the Obama team’s skullduggery:


Professor Turley’s above announced article posted on The Hill brings well-informed insights from experience gained in presidential impeachments: Blinken’s Immaculate-Conception Defense: Why things are likely to get worse for the Secretary of State.
Here’s an extract (emphases mine)
‘We still need more details on the underlying facts, but, if true, the allegations could constitute both criminal and impeachable offenses. Blinken reportedly made these statements as part of the process leading to his confirmation. If he lied, it could constitute making a “materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation” to Congress under 18 US 1001.
If Blinken lied or committed perjury, it could also constitute an impeachable offense. One complicating issue is that this did not technically occur while in office but in pursuit of that office. Moreover, there may be other statements since becoming secretary of state.
Of course, during the Clinton impeachment, the question of whether perjury constitutes an impeachable offense was raised. When I testified at the impeachment hearing, I maintained that it clearly does meet the standard of a “high crime and misdemeanor.” In my view, it did not matter the subject matter….’
The fact is that cabinet and high-ranking officers have often been accused of false statements without facing impeachment or even prosecution. Ironically, the letter includes one notable example.
Former National Intelligence Director James Clapper during the Obama administration was accused of perjury before the Senate but was not sanctioned by the Democrat-controlled Senate or the Obama Justice Department.
He later signed the Hunter Biden letter. That history may be reassuring for Blinken….’

For Curiosity: Again it so happens last image input at 16:59 and published 17:00 hrs!
PS. from yesterday:


Below is my column in ”The Hill’ on the recent disclosure that the organizer of the infamous “Russian Disinformation” letter on the Hunter Biden laptop was prompted by then Biden campaign adviser Antony Blinken. He is, of course, now our Secretary of State and he follows a pattern of the “made men” of the Biden Administration .
Here is the column:Secretary of State Antony Blinken would really, really prefer to talk about grain in Ukraine this week. But many people are less interested in what Blinken is doing as secretary of state than in what he did to become secretary of state.
This week, Blinken was implicated in a political cover-up that could well have made the difference in the 2020 election. According to the sworn testimony of former acting CIA Director Michael Morrell, Blinken – then a high-ranking Biden campaign official – was “the impetus” of the false claim that the Hunter Biden laptop story was really Russian disinformation. Morrell then organized dozens of ex-national security officials to sign the letter claiming that the Hunter laptop story had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Morrell further admitted that the Biden campaign “helped to strategize about the public release of the statement.”
Finally, he admitted that one of his goals was not just to warn about Russian influence but “to help then-Vice President Biden in the debate and to assist him in winning the election.”
Help it did. Biden claimed in a presidential debate that the laptop story was “garbage” and part of a “Russian plan.” Biden used the letter to say “nobody believes” that the laptop is real.
In reality, the letter was part of a political plan with the direct involvement of his campaign, but Biden never revealed their involvement […continue at… ] ANTONY BLINKEN AND THE ‘MADE MEN’ OF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION — JONATHAN TURLEY
In assessing developments in the fulfillment of Veronika West’s dream vision of the rank dishonesty of Biden and the mainstream media in cheating and stealing the November 2020 election, it’s useful to consider the reputable view-point of this renowned professor of law who’s not a supporter of Donald Trump.
For ease of reference over the main points of the exposure I’ve extended the opening of Prof Turley’s paper, emphases are mine.