Professor Jonathan Turley’s further remarks in his New York Post article considered in the previous post strongly echo a poignant part of a dream of Joe Biden as a circus clown or ‘Joker’ (links to both terms) Veronika West received a few days before his ‘inauguration’ in January 2021.
That is, her dream is now prophetically pertinent to President Trump’s trial in New York City, where the jury is about to retire for deliberation.

THE PROPHECY

In describing spiritual entities operating behind the political situation, Veronika writes in The Joker, the Queen and the King’s Stolen Crown(emphases mine):

“As I looked at the other chair, I saw that it was a ‘three-legged stool’ (which looked almost like a high standing bar-stool). Now as I looked at this strange three-legged stool, I knew by revelation that this was also a ‘type of Throne’, but as I drew closer to it, I heard the Words, “Demonic throne of the darkness!”

Now as I stepped even closer towards this strange looking ‘throne’, I immediately noticed a large triangular shape engraved upon the seat of the three-legged stool and in the middle of the triangle was with an eye.

And as I looked at the triangle and the eye, I heard these Words, ”A love triangle… and the eye of Leviathan.” As those Words echoed loudly in the spirit realm, I heard these words, ”The triangle of Obama, Biden and Harris” and then again I heard,“A love triangle and the eye of Leviathan….
..In the dream as I remained watching, I saw The Joker and The Queen of Hearts begin to climb up the tall three-legged stool (One World Order Throne) and I noticed immediately that the stool was extremely unstable and not very strong.

The three-legged stool had no supports. There were no arms rests and no backing on the chair. This was going to make it extremely difficult for the Joker to mount the stool with the Queen and the heavy Gold Crown balancing upon his shoulders.

The Queen looked somewhat relieved and The Joker looked half dead. But… no sooner had The Joker and The Queen — who was still trying to balance the heavy Crown upon her head — began to sit down upon the three-legged stool/throne, I saw one of the legs of the stool suddenly break underneath them.

The heavy weight of The Joker and The Queen and Gold Crown was too much for the three-legged stool and I watched as The Joker and The Queen fell to the ground with a loud thud.

Suddenly the shouting, screaming crowds went deathly silent (you couldn’t hear a pin drop) and then, I saw the Gold Crown that had fallen to the ground begin to roll across the floor. I watched and listened in the utter silence of the arena, as the Gold Crown rolled right across the floor, stopping at the feet of The King who was still standing before his Throne…”

THE TRIAL’s ‘THREE-LEGGED STOOL’

Use ‘Three-Legged Stool’ link below to read in full

Under the above 8-page article’s sub-heading Three-legged Stool Professor Turley writes extensively beyond these short extracts (emphases mine):

‘A classic closing pitch by lawyers is to use a physical object like a three-legged stool. If any leg is missing, the stool collapses!

In this case, the government needs to show that there was a falsification of business records, that the records were falsified to conceal another crime and that Donald Trump had the specific intent to use such “unlawful means” to influence the election.

Even a cursory review of the evidence shows this case does not have a leg to stand on…’

1st Leg: Falsification of Records

‘The dead misdemeanor that is the foundation for this entire prosecution requires the falsification of business records. It is not clear that there was such falsification or that Trump has any knowledge or role in any falsification….’

2nd Leg: The Secondary Crime

‘The government must also show that any falsification was done to further or conceal another crime.

This is where the defense needs to bring greater clarity to its own narrative. Trump’s team needs to drive home that a non-disclosure agreement is common in political, business and entertainment circles. The payment of money to quash a story before an election is neither unlawful nor unusual…’

‘Had he been allowed to testify, Bradley Smith, the former Federal Election Commission (FEC) chairman, would have explained that, even if it were a campaign contribution, it would not have been needed to be filed until after the election — demolishing the notion that this was an effort to influence an election that would have run before any filing had to be made…’

3rd Leg: Criminal Intent

‘The government spent considerable time proving facts not in dispute. There is no dispute that there was a NDA or that Trump signed checks on these payments. It is like repeatedly telling a court that a driver drove 55 miles an hour down a highway and elected to change lanes with a signal. The intent is to convince the jury that somehow proving that an NDA was paid and that an affair occurred is proof of an offense. It is not…’

‘The entire basis for the alleged criminal intent is Michael Cohen, a disbarred lawyer and serial perjurer. Yet even Cohen did not offer a clear basis for showing a criminal intent to use unlawful means to influence the election. Everything Cohen described could be true and only show a desire to kill an embarrassing story before an election — again, not a crime…’

In summary, Jonathan Turley draws to this conclusion,

‘The prosecution preferred to use a serial perjurer who roughly half of the country views as dishonest as almost the entirety of their case. Even beyond Weisselberg, there is no corroboration for Cohen’s vague allegations on the record.

In the end, this three-legged stool is the very thing that all of us must stand on when accused. Who on the jury would want to stand on this stool with their own liberty at stake?

In the end, the defense needs to be honest with these jurors. The question is whether hatred for this man is enough to ignore the obvious injustice in this case. They may have come to this case with little doubt about Donald Trump, but the question is whether there is not any reasonable doubt about the crimes alleged against him.

In the end, we are all standing on that wobbly stool when the government seeks to convict people without evidence or even a clear crime. If we allow a conviction, it is more than a stool that will collapse in this Manhattan courtroom.’

[Jonathan Turley is an attorney and the J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School.]

IT’S NOW TIME FOR EVERY CROOKED POLITICIAN, JUDGE, ATTORNEY TO STAND BEFORE THE SUPREME JUDGE OF MANKIND, JESUS CHRIST.