Trump Trial Travesty – 34 grounds for miscarriage of justice

IT’S NOW TIME FOR EVERY CROOKED POLITICIAN, JUDGE, ATTORNEY TO STAND BEFORE THE SUPREME JUDGE OF ALL: JESUS CHRIST.

Ever so briefly, as I’m sure many are  now well aware of the stupidity resulting from the circus clown show, here’s just a couple of links to the very few I’ve had time to check and which may provide a fuller legal insight into the travesty of justice against Donald Trump:

I didn’t follow last week’s ‘hush money’ trial in Manhatten, New York, in any depth but afterwards wondered if there really is letter, as claimed, signed by the pornographer in which she attested to there never having been an affair with him.

So yesterday’s 7-page article by Paul Ingrassia, who led The Gateway Pundit team of reporters, is highly informative and can be easily read by clicking this Print-friendly link . (Image below links direct to TGP’s main post)

34 REASONS the Bragg-Biden Show Trial Should Have Been TOSSED OUT — Each One Alone Providing Grounds for a Mistrial

By way of conclusion here’s the closing reason (my underlining):

’34.
The judge conducted this trial unfairly from start to finish, and treated the defendant, his attorneys, and his witnesses horrendously.  He prevented President Trump and his lawyers from bringing in key expert witnesses. He admonished President Trump’s lead attorney, Todd Blanche, on the stand, and cast multiple, unnecessary wanton barbs at him. He excoriated the only pro-Trump witness he allowed to testify, Robert Costello, an experienced lawyer of the SDNY; at one dramatic point, in a complete and unprecedented breach of the code of judicial ethics, Merchan lost his composure and vacated the entire courtroom, press included, because he did not like Costello’s “tone” and “mannerisms” from the witness stand. Merchan allowed Bragg Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass to go on for hours in his summations – allowing Steinglass to explain fundamental aspects of the law, including the burden of proof, for the jury, even though he previously admonished President Trump’s lawyers from making even the slightest reference to the law. He also allowed Steinglass to go on wild tangents unrelated to anything having to do with the alleged crime, allowing discussions of “Bill Clinton” and “Monica Lewinsky” to enter the courtroom.  Merchan had previously declared, like a tyrant, that only he can interpret the law in his courtroom.  But then he allowed Steinglass to explain the law at great length, over and above the objections of President Trump’s attorneys. Merchan also buttered up the jurors to win over their sympathy, complimenting random things like their “note-taking” skills, attention, and timeliness. All these factors, in addition to everything stated above, are egregious breaches of professional and judicial ethics and serve as grounds for a mistrial.’

LEGAL-EAGLES

Now, for a couple of renowned professors regularly consulted by MSM as legal pundits (first image contains link):

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

Harvard law professor and author Alan Dershowitz weighed in on the Trump convictions by a corrupt court, a biased jury, and and criminal judge on Thursday.  Dershowitz pointed out what all of us are wondering – we still don’t know the crime President Trump allegedly committed.  Continue reading at https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/uDVvAe

PLUS this from Tim Fitton (emphases mine):

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding the unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump by Democrats in New York:

Pure corruption. Judicial Watch denounces this absurd verdict and Soviet-style criminal proceeding that has so abused President Trump. What just happened to Trump up in New York is criminal.

The guilty verdict against Trump is no surprise considering the rigged, kangaroo court proceedings run by a biased, conflicted judge and an unethical, politicized Democratic Party prosecution team. Today is a terrible day for the rule of law that will go down in infamy. This whole process is compromised, and this verdict should be overturned in an emergency fashion.

The evidence shows that Trump committed no crimes, and this is a prosecution about “nothing.” This and other Democratic Party-political prosecutions of Trump are an abomination under law and are destabilizing to our nation.

Judicial Watch will continue to expose in court the truth about these attacks on the rule of law, free and fair elections, and the U.S. Constitution. In the meantime, our elections have officially been compromised by this politicized prosecution.”

Judicial Watch has several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits related to the prosecutorial abuse targeting Trump:

The motto of Judicial Watch is “Because no one is above the law”. To this end, Judicial Watch uses the open records or freedom of information laws and other tools to investigate and uncover misconduct by government officials and litigation to hold to account politicians and public officials who engage in corrupt activities.

Lastly, this says it all:

Your comments are warmly welcome (NB: Comments Caveat & Prophecy Protocol on homepage sidebar).