Useful Definitions (Courtesy Cambridge Dictionary):
- Conspiracy – activity of secretly planning with other people to do something bad or illegal.
- Sedition – language or behaviour that is intended to persuade other people to oppose their government
- Treason – (the crime of) showing no loyalty to your country, especially by helping its enemies or trying to defeat its government:
- Minsk Agreements – The Minsk Agreements were a series of ceasefire and peace agreements signed in 2014 (Minsk I) and 2015 (Minsk II) to end the war in eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region, but they ultimately failed due to a lack of implementation and conflicting interpretations. Key provisions included a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weaponry, an exchange of prisoners, and a political roadmap for local elections and reintegration of the territory. (AI sourced)
The last reference point serves as background history of Obama’s second term in office, with Biden as ‘Vice President’ and must be kept in mind in their subsequent targeting of and treason against Donald Trump as sitting President.
The engineered failure of Minsk Agreements is described in Benoit Pare’s personally witnessed unique record of historical events, as reviewed in Dr Patrick Walsh’s article Who Is The Aggressor In Ukraine, which I recommend in my Update on Ukraine vs Russia war pertinent to peace deal.
Now, another extract is required regarding President Trump’s first term (2017-2021) prior to Russia’s ‘special operation’, as in pages 6-7 of Dr Walsh’s excellent ten-page article (emphases mine):
‘Paré recalls:
“In December 2024, on the Joe Rogan show, Mike Benz commented on this letter whose existence had been largely forgotten. He called it “the red lines memo” describing it as a direct warning from the US State Department to Zelensky. Getting the message across publicly via a consortium of NGOs was a way, as in 2013-2014 with the Maidan protests, of giving an appearance of Ukrainian popular legitimacy to an operation teleguided by Washington. The message was that Zelensky was not immune from another coup d’état if he dared to deviate from the priorities drawn up by his country’s true masters. With hindsight it is enough to reread the text today to be convinced that it was a near exhaustive summary of all the objectives of American policy in Ukraine. That is why Zelensky changed little or nothing from his predecessors’ policy.
As a result, the new majority never went back on the language law and even seemed to apply it without a second thought. It was as if the accelerated de-Russification of the country – since everyone could understand that this was what was at stake – was unstoppable.” (pp.466-7)
The ultra-nationalists told Zelensky that he would be hanged if he implemented Minsk. His family was also threatened.
Zelensky was, therefore, caught between the US deep state and violent Ukrainian nationalists. They operated as a double act, with the CIA running the Ukrainian nationalists and directing their fury toward Zelensky and the new members of the Rada. This was during the latter part of the Trump Presidency, when he had been disabled by Russiagate.
The new [Ukrainian] President and parliament subsequently caved in to the US and ultra-nationalist pressure and the Ukrainian civil war intensified toward a national war.
Paré resigned from the OSCE on March 12, 2020 but joined the election observation mission in Ukraine at the end of September 2020 and then returned to the Monitoring Mission in December 2021, when he was sent to Odessa. At that point Trump was out of the Whitehouse and Biden was President.
Paré recalls “the march toward confrontation,” during this period:
“When we look in detail at what happened in 2021, we see that it was in the wake of the Democrats taking office in the United States, on January 20, that there was a major acceleration in the radicalisation of Ukraine.
In addition to the closure of opposition channels, just 13 days after Biden’s inauguration … Zelensky signed Decree 117/2021, which ruled on the measures Ukraine would take in Crimea, when the territory would be retaken, in one way or another, including by force. The reading of this decree was reminiscent of the famous 2018 law on the reintegration of the Donbass.”
August-November 2021
“..At the same time, the Minsk Agreements were at a complete standstill, due to a lack of Ukrainian and Western determination to see them implemented…
In November, the Russians published exchanges of diplomatic telegrams with the French and Germans, in which Moscow asked the sponsors of the Minsk Agreements to try to convince Kiev to finally negotiate directly with the separatists. But Berlin and Paris replied that they could not force the Ukrainian’s hand. The publication of these exchanges seemed to be a message to the world that the Minsk Agreements were dead…”
Dr Walsh closes with this from What I Saw In Ukraine and adds his own conclusion:
“Originally, I suspected that the Russians had provoked the rising tension on the front from February 16 onwards to justify recognizing the Donbass republics, and then responding to their call for help… However, the events from February 16 to 23, 2022, tend to demonstrate a continuous Ukrainian/American provocation. It is not ridiculous to imagine that if the Biden administration had initially announced that the Russian attack would take place on February 16, it was because they knew that this was the day of the scheduled start of the Ukrainian actions, in a context where they also knew that the Russians, having ran out of patience, were on the verge of launching an Intervention. This date would not have been chosen at random, since it was just before the Munich Conference which would serve to rally the entire West behind the aggressed Ukraine… When the Anglo-Saxons announced on February 18 the withdrawal of their nationals by the 21st, they knew then that the Ukrainian provocation had begun, and that the Russian response was more than likely. With the CIA bases along the border, there was enough to anticipate Russian movements.” (pp.604-6)
Benoit Paré’s book, What I Saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022, Diary of an International Monitor, along with confirming everything written here over the last 4 years or so, also reveals the misinformation and disinformation which has deluged the West about the causes of the conflict in Ukraine, and who was in actuality really responsible for that war.’
Last Saturday Dr Walsh posted What The War In Ukraine Is Really About and refers to Trump as follows – and bearing in mind prophet Daniel’s vison of a bear and Veronika West’s prophecy Ukraine, Russia, WWIII and MSM deception, Patrick writes:
‘…So, we have a big problem. Our leaders provoked a war that they thought had limited liability for Europe. But they put the Russian Bear in a corner and the Bear decided to fight. And they never learnt from history that the Bear has a tendency to fight until the threat to him is no more.
The US President wants to end the war and win his prize with his Peace Plan. Europe’s leaders see him as a despicable betrayer and appeaser – but they will not tell him that. They are afraid of him, in truth. They feel they need to humour him, praise his big ego in every kind of way, however transparent they are in doing it. They want to wait until he is gone, get back to business as usual, and hope he hasn’t changed America, so that it abandons Europe for good, and has to fully pay its way in the world.
But America has produced a leader, and voted him back, to pursue the national interest in extracting the US from the mess it provoked on the European hinterland in Ukraine, in the most painless and profitable way possible….’
‘The fly in the ointment was the US democracy and the re-election of the rogue president, Donald Trump, who had a personal beef with those who had organised the Ukraine provocation and who were prepared to impeach and gaol him. His revenge would be to end their war and rub their noses in it.’
PS. NEWS UPDATE:
Continued in next post, part 2 of 4>>
Richard's Watch 