Major exposure of political rot in USA suppressing free-speech and opinion

Posted on by

For the 450th posting as follow-up on the prophetical musing 7 years ago on the exposure of political rot and corruption, it’s appropriate to have a MAJOR release of documented evidence of years of extensive political suppression of free-speech and opinion in the once “land-of-the-free”.

This in-depth 12-page report published by The Gateway Pundit by Bejamin Whitmore is seminal reading…

Fight for the First Amendment: Lawsuit Against Govt-Related Entities Suppressing Conservative Speech Expands After Top Players Caught Targeting The Gateway Pundit Prior to 2022 Election, PIVOTAL CASE EXPLAINED

Click for advert-free version (new screen) > https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/4UDRZg

PS (26 Oct):

4 thoughts on “Major exposure of political rot in USA suppressing free-speech and opinion”

  1. In my view we need to draw a distinction between free speech and the right to speak the truth or what we believe to be the truth. Every witness in court has to swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. What is wrong is when people are silenced and prevented from telling the truth. A right to tell lies is not something we are interested in. Of course people can be mistaken and there can be debate and discussion so people have a right to say what they believe to be the truth even if they are wrong but no-one should have the right to say what they know to be lies. So we don’t stand for freedom of speech per se.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply ↓

    • Thanks Sid. This paper’s focus is upon that right to think and speak along political lines without censorship: “There is a vast array of government-sponsored censorship deployed against Americans that most are not aware exists. Federal authorities fund most of this through quasi-governmental entities, outfits, and non-governmental organizations. But they use this system to control what Americans think and as a form of social control, as a way of ensuring that certain narratives, stories, facts, and information is not challenged.”

      Like

      Reply ↓

      • No. I fully understand that but I think it very important to say rather than “we stand for free speech”, “we stand for the truth and no censoring of the truth”. They censored ivermectin and the downside of the vaccines and Hunter Biden’s laptop and Pelosi’s actions over Jan 6th etc. . We stand for the truth being exposed. “Free speech” can include the right to tell lies which we don’t support.

        Like

        Reply ↓

Your comments are warmly welcome (NB: Comments Caveat & Prophecy Protocol on homepage sidebar).