In case you missed these insertions added to the previous post, and now re-published below:
UK – posted by an independent Member of Parliament famous for his stand against Covid censorship (visit his Telegram):
USA
Appended to the previous is Tim Shey’s comment citing Robert f Kennedy Jr as follows:
“There’s a little known federal law that says you can not give an emergency use authorisation to a vaccine, if there is ANY medication, approved for any purpose, that is shown effective against the Target disease.
So, if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin were effective against covid, it would have been ILLEGAL for them to give the Emergency Use Authorisations to the vaccines and they could have never got them approved” – Robert F Kennedy Jr
PS: A Telegram friend queried DT headline ‘may be to blame’ and in appreciation of the editor’s well-written articles, I replied:
“As Sarah Knapton is DT’s science editor she’d expect clear scientific conclusion, but it can’t be done by usual experiment-repetition mode but has to be taken as a statistical correlation of related past events. Had I the luxury of time Liz, I’d like to have followed more deeply into my German GP reader’s warning (as blogged).”
Steven Miller, MD, PhD on X: “🚨𝐁𝐨𝐦𝐛𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐥: 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐂𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐮𝐢𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭 𝐑𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 🔺 𝐦𝐑𝐍𝐀 𝐈𝐍𝐉𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐖𝐄𝐑𝐄 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐕𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐒 🔺 𝐍𝐎 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐦𝐑𝐍𝐀 𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐒 🔺 𝐃𝐈𝐃 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃 🔺 𝐆𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐁𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐘 COVID-19” / X
LikeLiked by 1 person