It’s not only a farrago but also an utter travesty of justice. Unbiased observers can only infer that by bending the rules of the trial of Donald Trump, the judge himself is ‘bent’ – along with the District Attorney Bragg – AND both are at odds with very many leading legal experts! 

Here’s an incisive briefing on the corruption behind the scenes by a likely candidate for Vice President, if Trump is elected in November:

https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/hZ5urV

On Tuesday, Donald Trump posts on his Telegram (use Preview channel if necessary):

‘Could somebody please ask Judge Merchan, whatever happened to Mark Pomerantz, the man Alvin Bragg was furious at for the things he did on this contrived and unconstitutional case, and why wasn’t he allowed to testify?

Also, why did Judge Merchan not allow Brad Smith, the leading Election Law Expert in the Country, to testify. He would have ended the case quickly by explaining the Law and stating that President Trump did nothing wrong.

Likewise Bob Costello, and all of his direct and irrefutable knowledge, why was he so horribly treated and completely shut down by the Conflicted Judge, and why were his Emails and Text Messages not allowed to be shown…

And then, of course, there’s the BIGGEST EVENT OF THEM ALL, but I’m not allowed to talk about it because I’m under an illegal and unconstitutional GAG ORDER. This is the Biden White House at work. ELECTION INTERFERENCE!’

Yesterday, Fox news’ Emma Colton reports on some of those points in Trump Previews Closing Arguments in ‘Sham Trial’ – “Very Dangerous day for America”

‘Closing arguments follow Trump’s defense team motioning for dismissal of the case following the prosecution team’s star witness, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen. 

Trump attorney Todd Blanche said last week there were “absolutely no false business filings” and no evidence of connection to Trump.

“How on Earth is keeping a false story from voters criminal?” Blanche said.

“There is no way the court should let this case go to the jury with Mr. Cohen’s testimony,” he added.’

Cohen is the only lead witness but his testimony is completely unreliable because, not only did he admit during the trial to having lied and stolen from the Trump organization, but also he’s well-known for regularly lying. His reputation is that of a ‘serial perjurer’!

Emma Colton continues,

‘On Tuesday morning, Trump also said his team had an election expert who was set to testify last week and show that “everything was perfect” referring to former FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith…

The election expert did not testify after Merchan ruled that Smith could speak before the court on the basic definitions surrounding election law but not expand beyond that scope. 

“And we had a lot of other people. I can give you a list of 40 people that would say the exact same thing as these people said,” Trump said Tuesday before continuing, it is a “dangerous day for America.” 

TRUMP’S SUMMATION (as in blog’s Telegram)

Here’s ‘former Chief of Staff for DoD, Deputy Assistant to President Trump, the Russia-Gate Guy & best selling author’ Kash Patel:

LEGAL EXPERT

Extracts from Prof Turley’s re-publishing his New York Post’s column, which opens (emphases mine):

‘With the closing arguments set for Tuesday in the trial of former president Donald Trump, defense counsel are in a rather curious position.

There is still debate among legal experts as to the specific crime that District Attorney Alvin Bragg is alleging.

Trump’s lawyers are defending a former president who is charged under a state misdemeanor which died years ago under the statute of limitations. It was then zapped back into life in the form of roughly three dozen felonies by claiming that bookkeeping violations — allegedly hiding payments to Stormy Daniels to ensure her silence about a supposed affair with Trump — were committed to hide another crime.

But what is that second crime?

Even liberal legal analysts admitted that they could not figure out what was being alleged in Bragg’s indictment. Now, after weeks of trial, the situation has changed little.’

‘…Judge Merchan has ruled that the jury does not have to agree on what that crime is. The jury could split into three groups of four on which of the three crimes were being concealed and Merchan will still treat it as a unanimous verdict.

The jury has been given little substantive information on these crimes, and Merchan has denied a legal expert who could have shown that there was no federal election violation.

This case should have been dismissed for lack of evidence or a cognizable crime. The jury will be reminded that the burden is on the government, not the defense…’

THE NEXT POST WILL NOTE HOW HIS COLUMN THEN ‘ECHOES’ PROPHECY!

OTHER HEADLINES