This morning Donald J Trump Telegram quotes Alan M. Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School (cited as “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer” and one of its “most distinguished defenders of individual rights,” “the best-known criminal lawyer in the world,” “the top lawyer of last resort”) as saying,

“The Alvin Bragg case against President Donald J. Trump is the worst case I’ve ever seen in 62 years of practicing Law in the United States of America. It was totally contrived, unfair, and unjust. It should not be allowed to stand!”

PS INSERT:
The Chairman of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board (PIAB), Devin Nunes:
“I can say this, those days are over.”

Despite the fact that the President of the United States had declassified the 40-page ICA report, it was seditiously ignored.

In other words:
Jack Smith had no probable cause to raid Mar-a-Lago.

That’s because—BARRY WAS LOOKING FOR THIS!

Devin Nunes: Barack Hussein Obama raided Mar-a-Lago over his damning ICA report, which revealed that he spearheaded the overthrow of the U.S. government—not just in 2016 and 2017, succeeded in 2020, and yet again in 2024. Welcome to Lisa Monaco and her treacherous conspiracy, “Arctic Frost.”

Join: @FBIKashPatel (https://t.me/KashPatel_TG)✅️

Moreover, early this month I’d espied this excellent timeline on The Bruges Group by Theodore W Denny III of Nashville which acts as a summary of my ongoing coverage of political corruption in America, and I note his remark on exposures having started.:

THE PATTERN THEY HOPE YOU WON’T SEE
by Theodore W Denney III

Before America votes in 2026, you deserve to know what’s already in the public record — and what may be coming next.

—–

For nine years, American institutions have been running an experiment: How far can you stretch the machinery of law enforcement against one man before the pattern becomes undeniable?

The answer is now visible. It’s sitting in government reports, court filings, and whistle-blower testimony.

But here’s what most Americans don’t realize: the pattern isn’t just history. It’s still unfolding. And the 2026 midterms may determine whether it ends in exposure—or burial.
—–

**THE FOUNDATION WAS ROTTEN**

In 2019, the Justice Department’s own Inspector General confirmed what had been dismissed as conspiracy theory: the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign was compromised from the start.

Seventeen significant errors and omissions in FISA surveillance applications. Not typos. Material misrepresentations to a secret court that operates on trust. FBI agents texting each other about their contempt for the target while the investigation was live.

This wasn’t alleged by partisans. It was documented by the government’s own watchdog.

That was the foundation. Everything after was built on it.
—–

**THE MANHATTAN CASE: LEGAL ORIGAMI**

The underlying conduct—reimbursing a lawyer for a payment to an adult film actress—occurred in 2016 and 2017. Under New York law, falsifying business records is a misdemeanor with a two-year statute of limitations. That clock expired years ago.

District Attorney Alvin Bragg needed a felony. So he performed a legal maneuver that even sympathetic scholars called “novel” and “untested.”

He charged Trump with falsifying records *with intent to commit another crime*—elevating it to a felony. But he never charged Trump with that other crime. He just alleged Trump *intended* to commit it. The “other crime” was a state election law requiring proof of *yet another* underlying offense. Three stacked layers of legal theory—to resurrect a case federal prosecutors, the previous Manhattan DA, and the Federal Election Commission all declined to pursue.

The banks that received these records? Never consulted. No complaint. No harm. Loans repaid in full.

The judge instructed jurors they didn’t need to unanimously agree on *which* underlying crime Trump intended—just that he intended *one of them*. Legal scholars questioned whether this violated the constitutional right to a unanimous verdict.

First criminal prosecution of a former president. Over bookkeeping entries that harmed no one. Based on a theory never before tested.
—–

**THE NEW YORK CIVIL CASE: CAMPAIGN PROMISE DELIVERED**

In 2018, Letitia James ran for Attorney General on an explicit promise: investigate Donald Trump. Before she’d seen a document. Before she’d identified a victim.

“We will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump,” she told NBC News before taking office.

She won. Then she delivered.

James filed a civil fraud lawsuit alleging Trump inflated asset values. She sought over $450 million. Deutsche Bank executives testified they conducted their own due diligence, found no fraud, made millions in interest, and were eager to continue the relationship.

No victim. No complaint. No harm.

Judge Arthur Engoron found fraud anyway—ruling “fairness in the marketplace” was the victim. He imposed a $464 million penalty.

In August 2025, a New York appeals court threw it out entirely—calling it unconstitutionally excessive under the Eighth Amendment.

James promised to get Trump. She got a headline. The appeals court erased the money.
—–

**THE GEORGIA CASE: WHEN THE PROSECUTOR BECAME THE STORY**

Fulton County DA Fani Willis charged Trump and eighteen co-defendants with racketeering—the most sweeping case in the pattern.

Then her own conduct derailed it.

A defendant alleged Willis had an undisclosed romantic relationship with Nathan Wade—the special prosecutor she’d hired, who’d been paid over $650,000 in public funds. Willis claimed the relationship began *after* Wade was hired.

A witness—Willis’s former friend—testified under oath it began years earlier. Cellphone data showed Wade visited Willis’s condo at least 35 times before when they claimed their relationship started.

A Georgia appeals court ruled Willis should be disqualified. The most ambitious prosecution is now in limbo—undone by the prosecutor’s own choices.
—–

**THE FEDERAL CASES: PRECEDENT BACKFIRE**

Special Counsel Jack Smith brought two federal cases. He pushed for trial before the 2024 election.

The Supreme Court pushed back.

In *Trump v. United States*, the Court ruled 6-3 that former presidents enjoy substantial immunity for official acts—analysis that should have been completed before charges were filed.

Both federal cases were dismissed. Jack Smith created precedent expanding presidential immunity beyond anything that existed before he filed charges.
—–

**THE SCOREBOARD**

Four years of prosecutions:

– **Manhattan**: Conviction with no penalties. Appeal pending.

– **New York civil**: $464 million thrown out entirely.

– **Georgia**: DA disqualified. Case in limbo.

– **Federal cases**: Both dismissed.

Novel theories collapsed. A prosecutor disqualified. A half-billion-dollar penalty erased.

And the man at the center is in the White House.

—–

**NOW THE PATTERN REVERSES**

Here’s what most coverage misses: the exposure phase has only begun.

Since January 2025, the dynamics have inverted. The investigators are now under investigation. The prosecutors face prosecutors. And the institutional machinery that spent nine years building cases against one man is now generating evidence about itself.

This isn’t speculation. It’s already happening:

**Letitia James** was indicted in October 2025 by a federal grand jury in Virginia—charged with bank fraud related to mortgage applications. The same woman who campaigned on prosecuting Trump now faces a federal case of her own. Her attorneys call it “political retribution.” Prosecutors cite “ample evidence” that her cases against Trump were selectively motivated.

**James Comey**, the FBI director who initiated the 2016 investigation, has been indicted and pleaded not guilty to charges of lying to Congress.

**Inspectors General** across multiple agencies have announced ongoing reviews of conduct during the 2016-2024 period. Reports are scheduled. Testimony is being compiled.

**FOIA litigation** continues to pry documents loose—internal communications that contradict public statements, decision memos that reveal the gap between official explanation and operational reality.

**Congressional oversight** has expanded. Subpoenas have been issued. Transcripts are being taken. The investigative infrastructure that was once aimed at Trump is now aimed at the institutions that targeted him.
—–

**THE RICO QUESTION**

Now watch the structure—because it matters.

RICO was designed to prosecute enterprises. Not isolated crimes. Coordinated patterns across multiple actors, jurisdictions, and years. The framework asks a simple question: Did these people act together, over time, toward a common objective?

The public record now contains every structural element RICO was built to identify:

– Multiple actors in different jurisdictions

– Parallel timelines suggesting alignment

– Identical language—*pattern, scheme, enterprise*—despite no formal coordination

– Official explanations that contradict operational behavior

– A sustained, multi-year pattern aimed at a single target

This doesn’t mean charges will come. It means the architecture of what’s already public matches the framework enterprise prosecution was designed to address.

The only missing element is a formal DOJ designation.

Whether that designation comes—whether this Justice Department pursues enterprise-style charges against the actors who built this pattern—may be the most consequential open question in American politics.
—–

**WHO PAYS, WHO PROFITS.**

If it happens, the political consequences aren’t speculation. They’re structural—the same physics visible in every major institutional scandal for fifty years.

The Democratic Party has lashed its identity to these institutions. The FBI. The Justice Department. The intelligence community. “Protect democracy” meant defending the system. Their messaging, their platform, their media surrogates—all insisted these actors did their jobs properly.

That’s not accusation. It’s public record. Exposed by a five-minute scroll through any Democratic leader’s statements since 2016.

If those institutions are exposed as having coordinated against one man—if the pattern is formally designated as enterprise conduct—Democrats absorb the structural damage. Their credibility is fused to institutional credibility. One falls, both fall.

The Republican Party—especially the MAGA wing—built the opposite position. Skepticism of the FBI. Distrust of prosecutors. “The system is corrupt” has been their argument for years.

If exposure comes, they don’t just benefit from vindication. They benefit from having named the pattern before it was proven. The base energizes. Skeptical independents reconsider. “Witch hunt” stops sounding like deflection and starts sounding like prophecy.

Independents will decide the midterms. They face a simple question: Were the institutions right, or were the critics?

The party that bet on the institutions pays when they fall. The party that bet against them collects when the bet lands.

That’s not spin. That’s political physics.
—–

**NOVEMBER 2026: THE INFLECTION**

Between now and the midterms, several timelines converge.

IG reports will drop. The James prosecution will proceed. Courts will unseal documents. Congressional investigations will produce transcripts and referrals. DOJ decisions will go public.

All of it lands before voters decide who controls Congress.

If Republicans hold House and Senate, subpoena power stays with exposure. Oversight intensifies. The investigative pressure on institutions continues to build.

If Democrats flip either chamber, subpoena power reverses. Investigations pivot away from institutional conduct. The exposure apparatus stops.

That’s what’s actually on the ballot. Not just policy. Not just personalities.

Whether the nine-year pattern ends in accountability—or gets buried by the same machinery that built it.
—–

**THE QUESTION**

They used enterprise theory against him. RICO frameworks. Treated phone calls and business records as evidence of criminal conspiracy.

If that standard applied to Trump, does it apply to them?

The evidence is public. The structure is visible. The reversal is underway.

One question remains: Does it reach conclusion—or does it get stopped?

November 2026 decides.

They’re betting you’ll forget. They’re counting on complexity to exhaust you. They’re hoping you’ll move on before the picture completes.

NEWS UPDATE:

Watch Live: Fani Willis to Testify Under Oath Before Georgia Senate Special Committee on Investigations 10 AM ET

PS (18/12):

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/fani-willis-crashes-during-hearing-pulls-race-card/

Continued in next post 3 of 4 >>