US ‘lawfare’ goes into overdrive: 2 – Chief Justice Roberts’ role

Posted on by

After being sworn in as the 47th U.S. President, Donald Trump smiles as he points to United States Chief Justice John Roberts during the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the U.S. Capitol’s Rotunda on Monday 20th January 2025.

Further to the past week’s eruption of ‘lawfare’ (weaponised law) with consequential calls to impeach the judge attempting to reverse the President’s invocation of a wartime Act of 1798, Constitutional expert professor Jonathan Turley writes in No, the House should not impeach…

‘I have previously written against calls to impeach federal judges who have ruled against the Trump Administration in the issuing of temporary restraining orders (TROs) and preliminary injunctions. The latest target of such calls in the House is District Court Judge James Boasberg, who issued a temporary restraining order against Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. GOP members are making a mistake in engaging in the same impeachment craze that took hold of the Democratic members in prior years (and continues this year). The way to respond to such rulings is to appeal them, not to try to remove judges (which is neither warranted nor likely)….’ (continue here)

HOWEVER, further to the prophetic words in Part 1 we now consider the actions of the 17th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States along with most pertinent and pointed historical comment, as well as related news:

Chief Justice Roberts Defends Rogue Judiciary, Slams Trump’s Call For Impeaching Judges in Rare Rebuke

Read advert-free PrintFriendly version in full here

NOW consider very carefully this article (emphases mine) by Wayne Allyn Root, CEO, businessman, best-selling author, and national conservative TV-radio host who has interviewed President Trump 16 times.:

WAYNE ROOT: Back in 2015, I Wrote, “Is Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Being Blackmailed?” This Question is as Valid Today as a Decade Ago.

The author opens:

‘The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Way back in 2015, I asked in one of my nationally-syndicated columns, if Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts was being blackmailed?

I laid out the case. It seemed obvious to me that he was either being blackmailed, or bribed, or he was a fraud from day one – a Deep State, liberal plant disguised as a “conservative” put in place to vote the wrong way on key issues.

Because Justice Roberts always votes against us, against the obvious conservative decision, for most, if not all, of the important, life-or-death decisions that change this country’s direction.

Look at the record….’ Continue reading here

Wayne concludes:

‘Which would you choose?

Trust me- those options are being offered every day by the Obama Crime Family to key political figures in DC. Republicans are being blackmailed, intimidated, extorted and bribed. That explains Justice Roberts and the Supremes ruling against us- AGAIN. That explains why we keep winning elections, yet we keep gaining nothing and losing everything. It’s all been fixed.

The Obama Crime Family is in charge.’

Judicial Coup: Radical Leftist Judges Wage All-Out War Against President Trump and the Nation — 129 Legal Challenges Filed in Two Months and 64 Injunctions His First Term! MORE THAN ALL US PRESIDENTS COMBINED!

Read advert-free PrintFriendly version in full here

CONTINUE with lots more items after this post shared on Richard’s Watch Telegram channel (Preview available).

PS to Exposures of US Judiciary...2 – Conflict of Interest, Family Political Involvement Marjie Lewis writes on her Facebook adding to my previous as follows (emphasis mine):

‘Wondering what would possess a federal judge to order planes in the air filled with illegals who are gang criminals to turn around??? How about the Judge’s wife being the founder of an ABORTION NGO funded by USAID??? and his daughter, Katherine, whose employer is Partners for Justice, an organization that provides legal support to criminal illegal aliens and gang members. PFJ receives 76% of its funding from government grants. The organization actively opposes deportations, mass incarceration and laws targeting violent gangs like Tren de Aragua (from Venezuela and deeply invovolved in human trafficking, drug smuggling and violent crime). PFJ takes credit for eliminating 5,000 years of prison time for illegals since 2018.
Shortly after investigative journalist Laura Loomer connected these dots, Katherine Boasberg deleted her Linkedin and Instagram accounts in an attempt to scrub her connections from public view.
This connection raises a major ethical red flag. The Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges states that judges must disqualify themselves from cases where their impartiality could be questioned. Specifically, it states that a judge should step aside when a close family member has an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.
Loomer’s reporting makes it clear that this is not just a minor ethical issue—it’s a serious conflict that could impact national security. The judge overseeing these deportation cases should not have any personal connections to groups that stand to gain from his rulings. And yet, here we are, with a sitting U.S. judge making decisions that align perfectly with his daughter’s professional interests.‘

Your comments are warmly welcome (NB: Comments Caveat & Prophecy Protocol on homepage sidebar).