Apologies over inclusion of Archko Volume – A Critique

Thank you to my readers who queried the veracity of the Archko Volume and Tim Shey and I offer our sincere apologies. The two postings were temporarily removed but then retained after another reader’s query.

Tim adds this comment and I note the Critique generated an extensive discussion:

“Richard: I just found this:

A Critique of the Archko Library

A Critique of the Archko Library – Defending Genesis (wordpress.com)

It looks like the Archko Volume is false. I apologize to anyone that I may have led astray. I am going to delete it from my two blogs.

The reason why I posted the Archko Volume on my two blogs is that I was staying with this family in Montana years ago and I noticed the Archko Volume in their bookcase. I read a little and then forgot about it. A few months later, I was hitchhiking and this other family let me stay overnight at their place. I noticed the Archko Volume in their bookcase, so I thought that the Lord wanted me to read it some more (two witnesses).”

For my part I cannot offer any excuse save to say the ‘Report’ reminded me of thinking, when a boy in church, I’d have liked to have been alive in Jesus’ times to see and hear him – AND all around the walls were large sculptured scenes from his trial and journey to crucifixion and death, known as The Stations Of The Cross. Moreover, during a Latin Mass the interspersed readings in English from the Gospels and Epistles catch one’s attention, especially the apostle John’s attestation closing his account:

“This is that disciple who giveth testimony of these things, and hath written these things; and we know that his testimony is true. 25 But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written.” (John 21 – Douai-Rheims)

2 thoughts on “Apologies over inclusion of Archko Volume – A Critique

  1. Hello Richard, so I missed the evidence of the volume being false. What evidence was produced? I have no dog in the fight so am not looking for either a defense of the volume or an accusation against as much as wanting to understand why the blog was removed? I must say that I doubted the veracity based on the fact that if true this would be front page everywhere yet is never heard of. Thanks, Mark Jenson

    Liked by 1 person

Your comments are warmly welcome (NB: Comments Caveat & Prophecy Protocol on homepage sidebar).